My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-11-2006 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
09-11-2006 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/14/2019 2:14:55 PM
Creation date
7/15/2015 1:58:34 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 28, 2006 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />(#06-3219, Edson Spencer, Continued) <br />Ordway stated originally these two lots were separated and were combined by Mr. Spencer and that <br />Mr. Spencer is now requesting the two lots be split again. <br />Murphy stated approval of the plat does not require a decision on the road. <br />Turner stated the resolution before the Council says the existing roadway shall be widened to 20 feet and <br />would need to be modified if the Council approves a width other than the 20 feet. <br />Gaffron stated this is a preliminary plat resolution and recommended that if the property owners are not <br />required to widen the roadway to 20 feet, that language should be deleted. Gaffron noted another <br />resolution would be before the Council once the applicants request final plat approval. <br />Murphy moved, Peterson seconded, Application #06-3219, Edson Spencer, 1135 Spring Hill Road, <br />to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5500, a Resolution granting preliminary approval of a Class II <br />subdivision for property located at 1135 Spring Hill Road, with the roadway being left at 17 feet. <br />Sansevere indicated he would be opposed to that motion since it does not require the property owners to <br />increase the width of the roadway at some point in the future. Sansevere inquired how long the driveway <br />is. <br />Grant noted the roadway is approximately three-tenths of a mile in length. <br />VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 1, Sansevere Opposed. <br /> <br />12. #06-3220 JULE AND ELIZABETH HANNAFORD, 1220 BRACKETTS POINT ROAD – <br />VARIANCE <br />Jule and Elizabeth Hannaford, Applicants, were present. <br />Curtis stated the applicants are proposing to remove the existing deck and construct a new deck which <br />will be 4.5 feet closer to the lake, have a lower profile when viewed form the lake, and become more <br />functional for the property owners. A new rear (street) stoop is also proposed. As part of this application, <br />the two-foot wide concrete path within 75 feet of the lake will be removed as well as other miscellaneous <br />hardcover on the property. <br />The Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of hardcover and lake setback variances to <br />allow reconstruction of a new deck within the footprint of the existing deck provided the applicants <br />remove all of the hardcover elements as initially proposed. <br /> <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br />PAGE 13 <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda 09/11/06 <br />Approval Of Minutes 08/28/06[Page 13 of 19]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.