My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-19-2020 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
10-19-2020 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2020 10:08:44 AM
Creation date
10/20/2020 9:52:27 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> Monday, September 21,2020 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> Staff presented a summary of packet information. Ms. Curtis noted due to a calculation error by the <br /> Surveyor,the property is currently 43 square feet over the 25% hardcover limit. Staff does not <br /> recommend approval of the variance; if the Commission finds Practical Difficulties support granting the <br /> variance to accommodate the turnaround requested, and the additional miscalculated hardcover, a <br /> recommendation for approval may be appropriate. <br /> Kirchner asked if the 10x10 back-up pad was pavers, is there some square footage given credit over and <br /> above that it wouldn't then count towards the hardcover. <br /> Ms. Curtis said it does not apply to driveways. The credit for pervious pavement applies to a walkable <br /> surface(patio, sidewalk), but nothing that is driven on. <br /> Mr. Mark Enger, homeowner, 2697 Casco Point Road, said as Ms. Curtis referenced,they are asking for a <br /> small turnaround so cars can exit a very busy—and getting busier—road(Casco Point Road). He noted <br /> this application is based on safety and all of the difficulties around it are tied to a safety element. He feels <br /> the opportunity to exit the property facing the roads reduces the safety risk to the owners and visitors, but <br /> also to the general public driving on Casco Point Road. Mr. Enger said Mrs. Enger's parents owned the <br /> property and they've been connected to it since the 1970's and noted the property had a different design <br /> and they didn't have problems exiting the property many years ago. He said the existing property, <br /> previous to the Enger's construction had a hardcover of 30.49%;the proposal with the correction Ms. <br /> Curtis referenced that the 100 square feet would bring the total hardcover to 25.7%. The driveway is very <br /> long, steep and winding that connects directly to Casco Point Road. Since the Engers have lived there, it <br /> seems to be getting busier with construction and service vehicles, and approximately 75%of homeowners <br /> are exiting the very long dead-end road. He noted parking is currently allowed on both side of Casco <br /> Point Road, which adds to the complexity and the impact on visibility. Mr. Enger said traffic coming <br /> from the North to the South creates a particular visibility issue and noted their neighbors to the South <br /> have a turnaround and their lot is a similar shape and size. He noted there have been several near-misses <br /> backing out onto the road because of the traffic. As Ms. Curtis referenced,they have received many <br /> letters of support from neighbors, and have heard from their mailman and service providers, many of <br /> whom who have perhaps experienced the effort of backing out on to Casco Point Road. Mr. Enger said <br /> when they designed the house,they were living in Oregon and quite frankly expected their designer to <br /> identify some of the challenges of the driveway and did not. He also noted they weren't expecting as <br /> much traffic as there has been on Casco Point Road, and said the fact that they're only asking for 100 <br /> square feet to solve a very present problem hopefully tells the Commission that they're not trying to gain <br /> the system. Mr. Enger said they are asking for approval of the variance application. <br /> Chair Ressler opened the public hearing at 7:39 p.m. <br /> Chair Ressler closed the public hearing at 7:39 p.m. <br /> Chair Ressler asked Ms. Curtis on the right-hand side of the sketch onscreen where some is shaded <br /> bituminous and some is clear but noted bituminous, he asked what the cutoff rendering is. <br /> Mr. Enger said they have an easement with the neighbor and is a shared entrance to both of their <br /> driveways and has been in place for many years. <br /> Page 14 of 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.