My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-17-2020 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2020
>
08-17-2020 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 9:20:25 AM
Creation date
10/16/2020 9:18:12 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
195
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Date Application Received:08/18/2020 <br /> Date Application Considered as Complete:08/18/2020 "VO�j4?)O <br /> 60-Day Review Period Expires: 10/17/2020 i <br /> To: Chair Ressler and Planning Commission Members y, ,t <br /> Dustin Rief, City Administrator �< G1 <br /> '"ES H O�� <br /> From: Laura Oakden <br /> Planner <br /> Date: September 21, 2020 <br /> Subject: #LA20-000056, Kuhl Design Build, 3249 Casco Cir,Variance <br /> Public Hearing <br /> Application Summary: The applicant is requesting a side yard setback variance. <br /> Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff finds the applicant does not meet practical <br /> difficulty standards. <br /> Background <br /> The property has a home and an existing accessory structure on a substandard lot. The <br /> accessory structure is currently placed 2'from the side property line where 7.5' is required. The <br /> applicant is proposing to add a loft to the building and raise the roof line which will increase the <br /> massing of the building in the setback area. <br /> Practical Difficulties Analysis <br /> Applicant Submittal Information:The applicant has identified current placement of the structure <br /> as a practical difficulty supporting the requested variance. Additionally, they have provided <br /> supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be <br /> asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br /> Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Regarding practical difficulty, Staff finds the <br /> application has reasonable use of the property for a single family home. The existing accessory <br /> building is legal nonconforming and can be re-built and maintained, or relocated. There is open <br /> space on the property within the conforming building setbacks. The new roof line <br /> encroachment would serve as a convenience and is not necessary for the use of the property. <br /> Staff finds the practical difficulties have not been met. <br /> LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET <br /> Section 78-350—Accessory Building Setbacks: <br /> No proposed phanges to the existing setback. The project would create a new encroachment <br /> with a taller roofline within the North side setbacks. The existing garage is 2'where a 7.5' is <br /> required. <br /> Section 78-1403-Structural Building Coverage: The property current has 15.8%structural <br /> coverage with no proposed changes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.