My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-17-2020 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2020
>
08-17-2020 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 9:20:25 AM
Creation date
10/16/2020 9:18:12 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
195
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7. It is suggested that the building design/ material continue the architectural standard established by <br /> Stonebay. <br /> 8. I note that the narrative suggests a decorative fence and masonry columns, a detail may be helpful. <br /> Staff continues to suggest that screening be incorporated along Willow and Wayzata, and the screening <br /> include berming. <br /> 9. Watershed District approval will be required for all stormwater management, and erosion control plans. <br /> 10. Staffs analysis of the project based on the applicable section of the RPUD standards is summarized in the <br /> table below. The Planning Commission and Council find this summary table helpful in their analysis. <br /> Section Standard Flexibility Requested? <br /> 1 (1) Minimum area: 5 acres No. Part of the Stonebay <br /> or tied to adjacent RPUD RPUD <br /> 2 Uses. Allowed: Multifamily <br /> residential <br /> 3 Sewer availability No. Sewer is available and <br /> the density is greater than <br /> 1 unit or 2 acres <br /> 4 Density. Each development in No, assuming approval of <br /> the RPUD district shall have a amendment. <br /> density within the range <br /> specified in the <br /> comprehensive plan for the <br /> specific site. <br /> 5 Incentives. The city may None requested <br /> utilize incentives to <br /> encourage the construction of <br /> projects which are consistent <br /> with the city's housing goals. <br /> 6 Floor Ratio Ration, up to 1.0 To be determined <br /> 7a Setbacks Yes. External street <br /> setbacks not met. <br /> 7b Height, stories, roof style No. To be verified <br /> 7c Outside storage No. None proposed. <br /> 11 10% Private Recreational Area No, tot lot shown, size to <br /> (Active and/or Passive) be verified <br /> 12 Common Ownership No. <br /> 13 Signage Signage plans not yet <br /> developed <br /> 14 Landscaping Landscaping Plans not yet <br /> developed <br /> 15 Architectural Standards Final plans not developed, <br /> but are anticipated to be <br /> based on Stonebay <br /> palette. <br /> 16 Flexibility from standards <br /> 17 Traffic Studies Not suggested <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.