My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-14-2020 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2020-2024
>
2020
>
09-14-2020 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/30/2020 2:09:11 PM
Creation date
9/30/2020 2:09:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday, September 14,2020 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> proposed a 15-lot subdivision which was quite a bit more dense than proposed today. As part of that <br /> proposal the developer needed to provide municipal services. He noted this project is also proposing an <br /> expansion of the MUSA but does not propose any change to the land use or change to the density. It is <br /> consistent with existing code and is consistent with what the Comprehensive Plan says with the exception <br /> of the MUSA boundary. <br /> Walsh asked if he could clear up some of the issues from the past. When the developer came and <br /> proposed 15 units, it increased the density and because the density was so high,they couldn't do septic <br /> systems at that time because the yard wasn't big enough. The reason for the denial was the density issue, <br /> so it was a moot point for the septic versus being on the MUSA. Over time,they are also looking at the <br /> ecological issues of being close to wetlands or being downhill to lakes and having the opportunity to do it <br /> correctly the first time so there aren't any potential problems in the future,and noted the Council has tried <br /> to lean that way. He thinks in the sketch plan the Council decided it would be a good situation to look at. <br /> Barnhart said the Comprehensive Plan contemplates expansion of the MUSA for all properties,not <br /> necessarily high density properties, and there are certain priorities. One of the priorities is proximity to <br /> the lake or tributaries and he pointed out on the onscreen map that the left side is basically a tributary to <br /> Lake Minnetonka and does meet criteria for expansion of the MUSA. In reviewing the Comp Plan in this <br /> proposal, Staff recommends approval of the MUSA expansion. The Met Council establishes a minimum <br /> density the City must have in their served areas of 3 units an acre throughout the community. The City is <br /> currently at 4.68 units per acre,based on the 2020/2040 Comp Plan; if approved,this proposal would <br /> drop that to 4.43 units per acre, noting it is a relatively modest drop. He said that is the point behind the <br /> Council putting together the Comp Plan in 2018 that identified the potential for a need to expand the <br /> MUSA and provide enough cushion to do so without putting density in areas where they don't want to put <br /> density. <br /> Walsh asked for future reference,when they get down to the 4.43,how much flexibility does the 1.43 <br /> extra give. <br /> Barnhart said he doesn't know that number. <br /> Walsh said that's always a good number for the Council to remember, so if someone like the Willow and <br /> 112 property that they want to look more like Stone Bay, would actually bring the density down, and <br /> when the Council has those opportunities,they like to bring it down if they can and understand how much <br /> room and flexibility they have. <br /> Barnhart noted it's an interesting question, because it is the number of lots,but it's also the amount of <br /> acreage, so on a big parcel like the Dumas Orchard which is approximately 30 acres, if they were to drop <br /> the density from what the guidance is of 20 units/acre down to 3-4 units/acre that would probably have <br /> some impact. The Willow property is a relatively small 3 acre piece, so it will impact but not drastically. <br /> He said he could include some numbers in a packet. <br /> Walsh said yes,that would be a reminder of the tools the Council can use as they look at these <br /> developments coming in and try to keep the density down. <br /> Printup said across the street on the corner,the Preserve, about 20-30 years ago people were screeching in <br /> town because they wanted to develop it, and it would've been around 10 homes. Because of the passage <br /> of time, and because of the thumb of the Met Council and different regulations,now the City is looking at <br /> Page 4 of 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.