My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-13-2020 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2020-2024
>
2020
>
08-13-2020 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2020 3:48:55 PM
Creation date
9/4/2020 3:48:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Thursday,August 13,2020 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> PUBLIC COMMENTS <br /> None <br /> PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT <br /> 14. LA19-000065—CITY OF ORONO TEXT AMENDMENT RELATED TO SUBDIVISIONS <br /> Barnhart gave a review of draft changes to the Subdivision Code, noting it is a lot of information to <br /> review so he is not asking for approval tonight, instead he would like to hear any comments or questions <br /> the Council may have and he can come back with any changes or updates for a motion for approval at an <br /> upcoming meeting. <br /> Barnhart stated Staff was authorized over a year ago and has been working with the City Attorney over <br /> the last 3-4 months with the goal to revise and clarify the ordinances that relate to Subdivision. He noted <br /> that Councilmembers could see on their screens the comments that he,Attorney Mattick and the Planning <br /> Commission made through their review, noting the Council felt that was helpful with a recent subdivision <br /> to see how they worked through issues. <br /> Barnhart noted they tried to make the Subdivision process consistent with State statute, as in some areas it <br /> is not consistent, and also to make sure it matches City of Orono practices and policies. He said they <br /> removed some things that are not needed in the Subdivision Code. He said the main change addressed <br /> definitions, noting they wanted them to match the Zoning Code and there were 5-10 areas that did not <br /> match between the Zoning Code and Subdivision Code and that is problematic for many reasons so this <br /> was a good opportunity to make them match. In the current Subdivision Code there are three types of <br /> Subdivisions, Class 1, Class 2 and Class 3. Barnhart is proposing to strike those and use just one <br /> classification, as the process is basically the same(Planning Commission, Council, Public Hearings). The <br /> different classifications caused some confusion for applicants and occasionally Staff, so they did away <br /> with the three classifications to make it easier to understand the process. <br /> Another change made is proposing that every subdivision, which is the creation of a new lot, rather than a <br /> boundary line adjustment, would be platted instead of described by metes and bounds. While this may <br /> have a little more up front expense, Barnhart thinks it will pay off in dividends down the line when the <br /> property owner has to create an easement or adjust a boundary line, as they have a much easier legal <br /> description to create and go back through metes and bounds history. <br /> Finally, Barnhart noted they wanted to take a critical review of their subdivision process to make sure it <br /> met with State statute. There are a number of changes in the draft,accompanied by notes explaining the <br /> reasons why the changes were made to make things clearer for the Council. He said the Planning <br /> Commission reviewed the process over the last two months, noting they tabled action as they had <br /> questions and requested additional information. He pointed out that the Council has the June 15, 2020 <br /> Planning Commission Meeting Minutes,noting the July Planning Commission Meeting Minutes came <br /> late and he will get them to the Council. Ultimately,the Planning Commission recommended approval <br /> on a 5-to-1 vote with Commissioner Chris Bollis voting against the changes as he had some questions or <br /> concerns with several sections. <br /> Barnhart reiterated he is not looking for approval tonight but would like some feedback and direction <br /> from the Council. <br /> Page 2 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.