My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-13-2020 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2020-2024
>
2020
>
07-13-2020 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2020 2:40:02 PM
Creation date
7/28/2020 2:39:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday, July 13, 2020 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> right away. They did not get the house until September. He did not talk about changing the property line <br /> until later. He stated he did a review of approvals by the Council for variances in regards to lot width and <br /> side yard/rear yard setbacks. From what he found, the City tends to have a somewhat liberal policy of <br /> approving these if things seem appropriate. He is trying to say that, given the contours of the land, that is <br /> what they have. They have a house two doors down which is definitely going to change the character of <br /> the neighborhood, and that party was allowed two rear yard setbacks. He is asking to move the line to <br /> solve problems and put it where it should have been years ago. <br /> Mr. Kahler Nygard, 511 Mercy Drive, Fraser, Colorado, said he maintains the property in the summer. He <br /> stated where Mr. Nygard wants to put the property line is where the steepness starts to drop off and it <br /> makes perfect sense as far as maintaining the property. It is much safer to push a lawnmower up a hill <br /> than it is down a hill. He knows safety is part of the regulation that cities are afforded, and he asked the <br /> Council to take into consideration safety when figuring out the best way to maintain it, as far as 1380 or <br /> 1386. He said 1386 should be the property that maintains the steep part of the hill. <br /> Walsh noted both properties are over the hardcover so massaging one or the other does not make that big <br /> of a difference to him. As far as the boathouse, when someone is making a non-conforming use worse, he <br /> has a problem. Less than six feet is creating a bigger, long-term problem for anybody who is going to <br /> maintain the side of the boathouse, let alone the 1-2 feet that is being proposed. Six feet allows the owner <br /> to walk around the boathouse without any trespassing issues while maintaining it. <br /> Crosby asked if there would be a mowing safety issue by moving the line. <br /> Johnson said it comes down to the City Council's stance about lot line rearrangements. The area could be <br /> planted with things that don't require mowing. Many people in Orono have created solutions for difficult <br /> terrain; how people plant and maintain an area is a freedom they have. The Council has seen many times <br /> lawful, non-confirming issues such as recently when an Applicant wanted to move his boathouse on the <br /> other side of the property and the Council said no because it is a lawful, non-conformance currently and it <br /> has to stay there. He stated everyone should be treated equally. He is not aware of an instance where the <br /> Council, in regards to a lot line rearrangement, gave approval to make a situation non-conforming. If the <br /> Applicant wanted to remove part of the boathouse to make it conforming,that would be a different <br /> situation. He would not want to mess around with a boathouse; they are a real privilege to have and you <br /> cannot get another one. He would not support a lot line rearrangement that creates non-conformance. <br /> Crosby stated the only thing that would make it conforming would be to get rid of the boathouse. <br /> Walsh noted designing is not in the City's purview. <br /> Johnson indicated neither property meets the 25%hardcover, so working with somebody to move the <br /> boathouse, if it was not creating or maintaining a non-conformity, is a different issue. <br /> Walsh noted the Council is either approving or not approving the application in front of the Council. <br /> Seals moved, Crosby seconded, to deny LA20-000024 for 1380 Rest Point Road, Lot Area, Lot <br /> Width,Hardcover, and Side Yard Setback Variances.VOTE: Ayes 4,Nays 0. <br /> Page 8 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.