Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,July 13, 2020 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> the Council for their consideration of the variance request. He said Carrie and he recently bought a lot on <br /> 2645 Casco Point Road. It is a dream lot for them. They are asking for a variance request for hardcover <br /> which is 2%over the 25%. Casco Point Road is a very busy road, and he said there is a sign the City <br /> recently put up that says"Share The Road With Pedestrians"and there is only one way in and out. <br /> Currently, a driver has to pretty much pull over to the side to let another car by. They were looking at <br /> having a driveway straight down so they don't have to park cars on the street. He said Carrie has a 15- <br /> year-old and a 12-year-old daughter, close to licensing age, and with the shuffling around of cars,they <br /> thought a driveway straight down would eliminate having to park on the road. There are blind spots on <br /> the road. He stated their neighbors, Dustin and Casie, sent an email in favor of the variance. One of their <br /> children was hit by a car because of biking in and out of the road from the driveway. He said the variance <br /> request is mostly a safety issue. They came up with a good-faith effort with proposing to have the house <br /> set back six feet from the setback line to the lake which will give better views for the neighbors. They are <br /> also looking at paver steps going up to the front entrance in the amount of 140 square feet although they <br /> would only get credit for 100 square feet. They are also being conscientious in the landscape design with <br /> hardy trees and plants that have root systems that absorb more water and create less runoff to the lake. <br /> Ms. Carrie Noble noted it is busy with a lot of traffic,the paths are very close, and there are a lot of <br /> walkers and runners, both adults and children. She said she feels it will help to keep the cars in the yard. <br /> In addition, the design would allow for storage of lake toys in the garage. <br /> Crosby asked if a three-car garage was planned. <br /> Mr. Hanson stated it is a three-car garage but is very thin and would be a tight fit for three cars. It is not <br /> oversized and there would not be space for paddle boards or other things; it has limited space. <br /> Johnson said he read the Planning Commission minutes and he understands the Applicants are trying to <br /> address safety, but at the same time it is new construction on a vacant lot. They are under the 20%for the <br /> structural coverage, but the Council has been very rigid regarding the hardcover number in particular on a <br /> new construction house. He could not support a variance for that hardcover. <br /> Walsh noted 7-8 years ago a homeowner did not get to have the 0-75 square footage in the hardcover <br /> calculation. 60 feet of shoreline gives them 4,500 feet in the 0-75, which means they would not have had <br /> 1,125 square feet of hardcover they now have. The changes were made to give people more flexibility to <br /> stay within the 25%. A few years ago, the structural coverage was changed from 15%to 20%to give <br /> everyone more flexibility so there are less variances. This is not a choice between a two-car or three-car <br /> garage. You get 25%;you design your house. When there is a blank slate,the Council opinion has been <br /> the owner has to stick to the 25%because the rules were changed so everyone could fit into that. He noted <br /> safety is always an issue. He lives on a one-car road. If anyone is coming, you have to go on the <br /> neighbor's grass to get by. Everyone has to be cognizant of who is coming and going;they have kids in <br /> the neighborhood as well. When he bought his house 20 years ago, it was 29%,which was above what it <br /> was supposed to be. With the changes, it brought his house down to 19%. It was a big change for people <br /> so they could build bigger garages, bigger houses, bigger decks. He would also stick with the 25%. It is <br /> up to the Applicant how he wants to allocate that 25%. <br /> Seals stated she also agrees with 25%. It is a different issue if the roads are dangerous and people are <br /> driving too fast which should be addressed. A perfectly designed lot is not going to fix the road problem. <br /> Crosby asked what square footage the 2%is adding. <br /> Page 4 of 19 <br />