My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-15-2020 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
06-15-2020 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2020 10:08:52 AM
Creation date
7/21/2020 10:08:37 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> Monday,June 15,2020 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> stated they would do some things with landscaping as well. She referenced the existing hardcover <br /> calculations displayed and the loop driveway. She indicated they are at 34.3%existing today and the <br /> proposed hardcover is putting the three-car garage on the driveway and taking off the leg, which is a little <br /> over 1,000 square feet of hardcover,taking them down to 29.62%. She noted the current hardcover is <br /> 34.4%and proposed hardcover is 29.4%, a reduction of 5%. Orono has the ruling of 25%, and they are <br /> still over what they are supposed to be and are asking for a variance of 4.4%. They are hoping the <br /> Commissioners can view it from the standpoint that they are decreasing their hardcover and also <br /> increasing the property value of the house by adding the three-car garage. They think they are improving <br /> the street appeal of the house. For their neighbors, it will help because then they will not have to put <br /> anything extra outside on the lawn or driveway. She thanked the Commissioners for their consideration. <br /> Chair Ressler opened the public hearing at 6:43 p.m. <br /> Mr.John Daly, Revision, LLC, 153 East Lake Street, Wayzata, said he has been working with the <br /> Gormans on the design and layout of the structure. He stated if the Commissioners had any questions <br /> regarding the construction or design, he would be happy to answer them. He pointed out that the house <br /> being original to 1960 and the Gormans being interested in keeping the home,the existing garage width is <br /> just under 22 feet. It does not work very well to get two vehicles into the garage. When they were <br /> designing the plans of what should be done,they were trying to capture some of the existing garage space <br /> for the new garage space but realizing they needed some of the width to be able to store their everyday <br /> vehicles. From a design standpoint, a sideload was a way of reducing hardcover. It was also consistent <br /> with other homes on the street;the four properties to the east all have sideload garages. They reduced <br /> hardcover but allowed for off-street parking. He noted Gormans are on a curve of Frederick Street. He <br /> said the first time he pulled up to the property, he wasn't quite sure if he could even park in the street. <br /> Chair Ressler closed the public hearing at 6:45 p.m. <br /> Ressler stated some things to note is they are meeting other setback requirements,they are reducing their <br /> hardcover by 900 square feet, and they are not going lakeward. Their rear setback is 99 feet where it is <br /> required to be 30;that definitely identifies the long driveway which is demonstrative of the pie-shaped <br /> lot. <br /> Kirchner said some additional things he appreciates in the application is that the Applicants are reducing <br /> their hardcover.Not only are they reducing it, but the proposed addition is over an already-existing <br /> hardcover, and they are taking it a step further and removing additional hardcover beyond that, about <br /> 4 '''/%. He thinks they are getting as close to compliance as possible without the City saying part of their <br /> house would have to be taken down. He does not know how else the City would get them in compliance. <br /> Bollis stated he agreed that it is a thoughtful plan, perfectly placed hardcover put over existing hardcover, <br /> and remove what is not necessary to get it as conforming as possible. He also likes that they went a step <br /> above and considered the neighbors and the back side of the garage and made sure it doesn't look like the <br /> back side of a garage. He is in favor of the variance. <br /> Erickson noted there are two factors that he thinks speak very positively for the variance: first,they are <br /> making a significant step in the right direction in reducing what was previously existing; second,the <br /> Applicants have unique factors that speak strongly for the variance,which is the triangular lot. <br /> Page 6 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.