Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 27, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 9 of 16 <br /> <br /> <br />Walsh stated Mattick spoke on the issue at the last meeting, who said the City cannot tie something in <br />from an enforcement position to a CUP because it is unrelated. He said unless there is something different <br />regarding the issue, the Council does not have a lot they can do to hold up the CUP. <br /> <br />Mr. Eric Vogstrom, 2710 Pence Lane, said he wanted to clarify that they feel confident they will prevail <br />regarding the lake violation but agreed it is not relevant in this situation. They have not had an issue with <br />the driveway for a long time. He said he talked to Roger when the frost first came out of the ground, and <br />they have had 90% of the traffic come through Walters Port and a very small amount come in through <br />Pence. The agreement is that none of the people from his place can cross over to the Dunkleys’, and it has <br />not happened in a long time. He stated for anyone to allege the traffic from Dunkleys’ is coming across <br />from Pence is absolutely ridiculous. He was told once or twice in the last 4-5 months from Roger to fix <br />the driveway. It was done, and he has not heard anything in months about the driveway not being <br />compliant or up-to-speed. He noted all of the violations are for Walters Port, not Pence, and are not <br />related to the Pence Lane project. He hopes the Council members did their research, and they will find <br />that most of the stuff he is saying is correct. <br /> <br />Seals moved to approve Resolution No. 7093 - LA20-000016 – Paul Thomas Design Build, 2710 <br />Pence Lane, Conditional Use Permit. <br /> <br />Seals asked if the Council could direct Staff to review the condition of the driveway because she believed <br />that was one of the conditions of the subdivision. She wanted to have Staff review it and keep it a separate <br />issue because they should not be intertwined. <br /> <br />Johnson asked if Staff entered a complaint. He said he received a letter and video showing the driveway <br />conditions. He does not know if there is a provision that it needs to be Class 5 or rock, etc. <br /> <br />Barnhart stated Staff does not create a Code Enforcement Complaint for each building issue/complaint for <br />active building permits. They work through those with the inspection process. <br /> <br />Johnson said in this case, he would recommend entering the most recent complaint from the property <br />owner so they can track that specific complaint about the condition of the driveway. <br /> <br />Johnson seconded the motion. Roll Call Vote: Ayes 5 (Crosby, Johnson, Printup, Seals, Walsh), <br />Nays 0. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br /> <br />18. LA20-000023, KELLEY PARROW O/B/O WEIS BUILDERS, 2635 KELLEY PARKWAY, <br /> RPUD AMENDMENT <br /> <br />Staff presented a summary of packet information. Staff recommends approval subject to comments and <br />conditions. <br /> <br />Walsh noted the only issue people had was regarding the lights, because they do not want them pointing <br />at them, etc. He said there should be down-pointing lights and asked if that was part of the <br />recommendation. <br />