My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-10-2020 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2020
>
02-10-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2020 3:33:38 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 2:57:54 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY OF ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. <br />5. Applicant has applied for the following variance[s]: <br />a. 75 -foot Lake Setback Variance <br />b. Average Lakeshore Setback Variance <br />6. In considering this application for the variances, the Council has considered the advice <br />and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed <br />variances upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated <br />traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on <br />values of property in the surrounding area. <br />ANALYSIS: <br />"Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes <br />and intent of the ordinance ...." The variances support the minimal expansion of a non- <br />conforming structure in the lake yard. Lake yard construction prohibitions are intended to <br />maintain the natural lakeshore and encourage development away from the lake. <br />Alternatively, the goals of average lakeshore setback include protecting views from land <br />into the lake, the requested variances to increase the height of the existing structure the <br />minimum amount necessary to meet the ceiling height and floodplain regulations is in <br />harmony with the Ordinance. The most adjacent neighbors are separated from the <br />structure and situated so that their lake views will not be impacted by the changes to the <br />existing building. The minimal additional mass of the flat roof areas within the setbacks <br />will not be closer to the lake than existing and will not negatively impact the views into the <br />Property from the lake. This criterion is met. <br />2. "Variances shall only be permitted ... when the variances are consistent with the <br />comprehensive plan." The variances resulting in reconstruction of the existing sauna <br />building without footprint expansions within the setbacks in a residential zone are <br />consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The variance to permit the upward volume <br />expansion is solely to conform to the floodplain regulations. This criterion is met. <br />3. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are <br />practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. `Practical difficulties,' as used in <br />connection with the granting of a variance, means that: <br />a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, <br />however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. <br />The request to permit a minor upward expansion of the building lakeward of the <br />average lakeshore setback and within the 75 -foot lake setback appear to be <br />reasonable; the flat roof design minimized any potential negative impacts; the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.