Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 9, 2020 <br />6:00 o'clock p.m. <br />Crosby noted it will allow the homeowner to have more hardcover in their original building by pulling the <br />old deck from there and bringing it to the house. <br />Walsh added the City holds a zero tolerance for any expansions of boathouses and they want to remain <br />consistent that it is a no for everyone. <br />Mr. Haack clarified that the oversight was the gable on the roof. <br />Walsh indicated that it would have to go back to the original roofline. <br />Mr. Haack said the homeowner hired people to put the dock together. The homeowner asked for <br />consideration that the dock remain, that it is smaller and their view is that the dock is not a deck. <br />Walsh said the homeowners can have what they had, but that it has to come off somewhere else and they <br />have to make that decision. <br />Curtis pointed out the areas of the expansions after Crosby asked to look at the original sketch. <br />Johnson asked if that was an after -the -fact sketch and noted the City was never considered in any of the <br />improvements. <br />Crosby indicated that he is clarifying on the gable part that the City was not considered. <br />Mr. Haack said he understood it was on the original submitted plans. <br />Johnson asked if Staff recommendations included returning it to its original state. <br />Curtis clarified that the recommendation was to not approve any hardcover variances. <br />Mr. Haack stated if the dock sections are taken off, the homeowner would be under the variance approval <br />for square feet of the property. <br />Walsh clarified that the homeowner will receive no hardcover variances. He can decide what to do with <br />the 74 square feet he has; he can do so within the footprint of what he had previously. The chimney and <br />gable would need to be removed. If the boathouse remains the same but is re -sided with 2 -inch stone <br />rather than '/2 -inch siding, he would be fine with that. <br />Curtis asked how the Council felt about the gable bump -out. <br />The Councilmembers indicated that anything which expanded the envelope and the volume needs to be <br />brought back to the original structure. The core shell cannot be expanded. If the homeowner gets rid of all <br />the deck, he will have 75 square feet to work with. <br />Johnson asked whether any changes will still require a permit. <br />Curtis indicated that was correct. <br />