My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-11-2020 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2020-2024
>
2020
>
05-11-2020 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2020 10:26:30 AM
Creation date
6/1/2020 10:25:54 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,May 11,2020 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> stumbling over its feet. The wheel does not need to be re-created; best practices are out there. Orono is <br /> doing it the hard way; Orono can copy from people who are doing it right. The City is kind of creating <br /> their own problems in many ways with the way things come to the Council. If the proposal had been put <br /> together with"These are the issues all the way up to this point,"the decision becomes easy and probably <br /> would have happened well before this time. <br /> Crosby said the Council wants to be proactive rather than reactive. He added he believes Rief received the <br /> message. <br /> Rief agreed that he did. <br /> 16. TERMINATION OF CLEANING CONTRACT <br /> Edwards said that for a number of years the City has had a cleaning contract, which, since 2012, has been <br /> with Vanguard Cleaning. The performance of the current contractor is subpar and has been declining <br /> significantly over recent months.The City required the overarching contractor to change out their crew to <br /> try to address the issue. The City is now on the third crew in the last 12 months;this crew has been <br /> cleaning the last month or so. There has not been an improvement in performance; in fact,there have been <br /> more issues such as lack of vacuuming. He noted Seals asked Rief to put the item on the agenda. He <br /> stated most of the department heads concur that the contract should be terminated. The discussion or <br /> disagreement will be what the City should do to move forward. Staff recommends termination of the <br /> contract. The contract has a 30-day termination notice built into it. If Council approves the termination, <br /> notice would be given the following day. The Staff member who manages the contract within the City has <br /> been considering ways the City might improve how cleaning is conducted. He said Orono has such a <br /> small number of facilities that it is not anyone's first priority when it comes to providing a service. In <br /> addition, having a Police Department attached is somewhat unique in the cleaning world,and having <br /> people cleared to enter, unescorted, into the Police Department has provided challenges. In addition,the <br /> scope of work outlined is perhaps too much and more than what the City needs. He proposed,as an <br /> interim solution with the possibility of it becoming permanent,that the City absorb the cleaning <br /> responsibilities within one of the seasonal positions, which is a Parks Maintenance worker, by changing <br /> that position from a Parks Maintenance seasonal position to a part-time Custodian and Groundskeeper <br /> position. It would amount to taking the existing Parks Maintenance position and adding some cleaning <br /> tasks to it. They believe the cleaning level needed in the facilities could be handled by a person in about 2 <br /> hours a day if the tasks were distributed throughout the day. Currently,the City pays$33,000 a year for <br /> the cleaning contract. Eliminating the contract by using a part-time person could be a potential savings <br /> achieved of roughly$12,000 a year. He has been talking with several department heads for a while, and <br /> as they were soliciting for the regular seasonal positions,they included the position in the solicitation. If <br /> the Council is amenable,the current Parks Maintenance worker could be moved to the new <br /> Custodian/Groundskeeper position, as he was selected for the Parks position with the thought he might <br /> perform both positions. <br /> Printup said he supports the plan; it is a good and solid plan. It is not increasing anything; it is moving <br /> things around.He asked why this well-developed plan was not brought up earlier. The Council recently <br /> learned the cleaning problem is 10-20 years old, and he can remember talking to a past Administrator and <br /> trying to figure out what could be done to mitigate some things about the cleaning services. Many years <br /> later, a well-thought-out plan is falling into place. As Johnson indicated,he would prefer the proactive <br /> piece rather than the reactive piece and succession planning that was talked about. He said the plan fits <br /> the City well and there are cost-savings. He suggested again the savings could go to a fall clean-up. <br /> Page 13 of 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.