My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-08-2015 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2015
>
06-08-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2015 11:09:44 AM
Creation date
7/15/2015 11:05:31 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
233
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />Item No: 9 <br />Exhibit: A <br />Ex City of Orono, Minnesota <br />Sign Retroreflectivity Policy <br /> <br />1. Purpose and Goal. The purpose of this policy is to establish how the city will implement an assessment <br />or management method, or combination of methods, to meet the minimum sign retroreflectivity requirements <br />in the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MN MUTCD). Substantial conformance with <br />the MN MUTCD is achieved by having a method in place to maintain minimum retroreflectivity levels. <br />Conformance does not require or guarantee that every individual sign in the city will meet or exceed the <br />minimum retroreflective levels at every point in time. The goal of this policy is to improve public safety on <br />the city’s streets and roads and prioritize the city’s limited resources to replace signs. <br /> <br />2. Applicable Signs. This policy applies to all regulatory, warning, and guide signs as set forth in the MN <br />MUTCD. Pursuant to Section 2A.8 of the MN MUTCD the city excludes the following signs from the <br />retroreflectivity maintenance guidelines: <br /> <br />A. Parking, Standing, and Stopping signs (R7 and R8 series) <br />B. Walking/Hitchhiking/Crossing signs (R9 series, R10-1 through R10-4b) <br />C. Acknowledgment signs, including Memorial signs <br />D. All signs with blue or brown backgrounds <br />E. Bikeway signs that are intended for exclusive use by bicyclists or pedestrians <br /> <br />3. Resource Materials. The city has reviewed and relied on numerous resources in adopting this policy. <br />These resource materials include: <br /> <br />A. Methods for Maintaining Traffic Sign Retroreflectivity, Publication No. FHWA-HRT-08-026, U.S. <br />Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration (November 2007). <br />B. Sign Retroreflectivity Guidebook, Publication No. FHWA-CFL/TD-09-005, U.S. Department of <br />Transportation, Federal Highway Administration (September 2009). <br />C. Sign Retroreflectivity: A Minnesota Toolkit, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Local Road <br />Research Board (June 2010). <br />D. Traffic Sign Maintenance/Management Handbook, Report No. 2010RIC10, Version 1.1, Minnesota <br />Department of Transportation (October 2010). <br />E. LMCIT Sign Retroreflectivity Memo and Model Policy, League of Minnesota Cities (Final Edition, <br />March 2014). <br /> <br />4. Sign Inventory. To meet the city’s goal of maintaining sign retroreflectivity above certain levels, the city <br />will maintain a sign inventory of all new or replacement signs installed after the effective date of this policy. <br />The inventory shall indicate the type of sign, the location of the sign, the date of installation or replacement, <br />the type of sheeting material used on the sign face, the expected life of the sign, and any maintenance <br />performed on the sign. As to existing signs, the city will perform an inventory of all signs covered by this <br />policy. The city recognizes this process will occur over time subject to the city’s monetary and human <br />resources. The city shall record the above information related to new signs to the extent that such <br />information is known and shall also include a statement on the general condition of the sign. <br /> <br />5. Removal of Signs. In recognition of the fact that excess road signs have been shown to reduce the <br />effectiveness of signage, as well as impose an unnecessary financial burden on road authorities, it is the <br />city’s policy to remove signs determined to be unnecessary for safety purposes and which are not required to <br />comply with an applicable state or federal statute or regulation. The removal of signs shall be based on an <br />engineering study and the MN MUTCD. <br /> <br />Item #09 - CC Agenda - 06/08/2015 <br />City Sign Retroflectivity Policy [Page 2 of 3]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.