My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-08-2015 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2015
>
06-08-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2015 11:09:44 AM
Creation date
7/15/2015 11:05:31 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
233
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Tuesday, May 26, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 9 of 22 <br /> <br />9. BALDUR PARK ROAD DESIGN GUIDANCE (continued) <br /> <br />The disadvantages of this option include a potentially unstable subgrade would be left in place, the <br />pavement structure would not be consistent throughout the project area, and the life of the roadway would <br />be less compared to other options. The total estimated cost for this option is $107,880. <br /> <br />The third option is a partial depth reconstruction, which would consist of removing and replacing the <br />existing pavement structure to a depth of 12.5 inches. The advantages of this option include a consistent <br />pavement structure throughout the project area, a separation between the aggregate base and underlying <br />subgrade materials, and minimal disruption to adjacent properties during construction. The disadvantages <br />of this option include a potentially unstable subgrade being left in place and a lessened life expectancy of <br />the roadway as compared to a full depth reconstruction. The total estimated cost for this option is <br />$180,110. <br /> <br />Martini recommended the City also consider making improvements to the sanitary sewer system. Since <br />replacement of the sanitary sewer would be very costly and disruptive, it is recommended that the existing <br />sanitary sewer manholes be sealed and the existing sanitary sewer main be lined to reduce I & I. The <br />estimated construction cost of this work is $108,580. <br /> <br />Martini stated Staff is seeking direction from the City Council on how they would like to proceed based <br />on the options presented tonight. If the Council would like to move forward with the project, plans and <br />specifications would be prepared in June, with bids being received in July. Construction would start in <br />August or September of this year. <br /> <br />Edwards stated funding is available for the project within the City’s budget. FEMA provided the City <br />with approximately $59,000 for certain repairs. Following the Watertown Road and Stubbs Bay Road <br />projects, there will be approximately $106,000 in the General Fund balance and the anticipated total cost <br />of the project is $215,000. <br /> <br />Printup stated he is okay with the recommendation, but that he was wondering if that included the I & I <br />issues. <br /> <br />Edwards indicated it does not and that he will be bringing that topic to the Council in the next few weeks. <br />Edwards stated it would be best to take care of the entire City’s infrastructure at the same time as the road <br />project. <br /> <br />Walsh noted this is a dead-end road with limited traffic and that given the water issues and sub-material, <br />there is no guarantee of extending the life of the road between a partial reclamation and a full-depth <br />reconstruction. Walsh stated he does not imagine getting 80 percent more life with full-depth reclamation <br />versus partial depth reclamation. Walsh stated given the dollars, it seems to make the most sense from a <br />longevity standpoint to go with the partial depth reclamation, which will still be a very good product. <br /> <br />Martini stated the biggest difference between the two is the ability to put a new base in and to provide <br />some separation between the sub-base and the roadway. Martini stated full-depth reclamation would <br />provide a little more flexibility in the future to continue to reuse the base. <br /> <br />Cornick asked if curbs and gutters will be installed for runoff. <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 06/08/2015 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 05/26/15 [Page 9 of 22]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.