My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-11-2015 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
05-11-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2015 10:51:02 AM
Creation date
7/15/2015 10:44:14 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
365
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 27, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 14 of 21 <br /> <br />5. #15-3722 STORMWATER AND DRAINAGE TRUNK FEE – SECOND REVIEW <br />(continued) <br /> <br />Gaffron stated under multi-family, it would be based on acreage. <br /> <br />McMillan stated in her view there should not be a credit since it is high density. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the City would not give credit for the wetland acreage towards the high density. <br /> <br />McMillan noted the other zones do not get credit for that. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated on a 20-acre site with 10 acres of wetland that is guided for multi-family/high density, that <br />could be 70 units whether they are individual lots or one or more buildings. Gaffron stated the question is <br />whether the City charges them on an acreage basis for the entire site or on a lot basis. Gaffron stated on a <br />lot basis, it would be very difficult to define what is appropriate because there could be anywhere from 4 <br />to 100 or more units. <br /> <br />McMillan stated if they do a unit fee the City will need to figure out a unit fee. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated if the units are stacked three high, the question becomes what the impact will be on <br />stormwater versus what the impact would be for the same units only stacked one high. <br /> <br />Walsh asked what the fee would be in that situation on a per lot basis. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated at a density greater than four units or more an acre, the fee would be $8,100 an acre. <br /> <br />Walsh asked what it is currently. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated it would be $8,000 times 20 acres. <br /> <br />Printup stated he likes the acreage concept. <br /> <br />McMillan asked how that would differ from the 2- and 5-acre zones. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the difference would be that the fee is based on a per lot basis. Gaffron stated the multi- <br />family would be based on a per acre basis. <br /> <br />McMillan asked how the Council feels about giving a credit for wetlands. <br /> <br />Walsh stated if the 20-acre parcel created another acre of wetland, they would get charged for nine acres <br />of buildable land, plus the conservation easements, times 8,000 if it is done on an acreage basis. <br />Cornick asked if the City has a definition on what a newly created wetland is. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated a stormwater pond is based on the amount of runoff and the rate of runoff. A newly <br />created wetland will likely not be built unless someone is mitigating for a wetland that is being filled. <br /> <br />Walsh stated it could probably be left as simply wetlands. <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 05/11/2015 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 04/27/15 [Page 14 of 21]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.