Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 13, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />__________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 28 of 40 <br /> <br />(8. #14-3690 FRED JOHNSON (C/D PURCHASER), PATRICIA PFEFFER (SELLER), 1565 <br />ORCHARD BEACH PLACE – RESOLUTION NO. 6490 continued) <br /> <br />Walsh stated in his view it would be prudent from a City standpoint to give the lot owner a buildable lot <br />by giving him the average lakeshore setback. Walsh stated that would not give him everything he wants <br />but that it would give him a true buildable lot. <br /> <br />Walsh stated in his view the City Attorney would feel that that is a much safer way to go forward. Walsh <br />noted there is a potential taking issue, but the variance would give them one less argument and he would <br />not be able to say that he does not have a buildable lot. Walsh stated what could potentially happen is that <br />a judge could say the City overreached and the judge may give him everything he is asking for. Walsh <br />stated the City typically does not give rear yard or side yard setbacks generally, but they have granted an <br />average lakeshore setback a number of times, which would give them a buildable lot. <br /> <br />McMillan noted two council meetings ago the Council asked the applicant to submit a revised plan but <br />the applicants did not attempt to submit a revised plan and instead continued to request all the variances. <br />McMillan stated she did not sense that there was any desire on the part of the applicant to minimize the <br />setback. McMillan noted the City has had other applicants that are willing to mitigate the setback by only <br />building a one-story house or changing rooflines and other things. McMillan stated in this situation the <br />applicant was not willing to work with the variances. <br /> <br />Walsh stated the applicant would like all or nothing but that it is still within the City’s power to give an <br />average lakeshore setback variance. Walsh noted without the average lakeshore setback, they areunable <br />to build anything on the lot. Walsh stated granting the variance would protect the City, which is the <br />Council’s job, and not overreach on this application. <br /> <br />Levang stated the Council has vetted this application a number of times and that the applicants have not <br />done anything to change their plans. Levang stated she is not willing to change the average lakeshore <br />setback since it is one of the City’s golden rules. Levang stated there has to be very extenuating <br />circumstances and they do not exist in this case. Levang stated she is not willing to change the vote that <br />was made two weeks ago. <br /> <br />McMillan stated even with a 400-square foot house there will need to be some extensive grading, which <br />raises the issue of whether a conditional use permit should be granted. McMillan noted it is also not <br />assessed as a buildable lot. <br /> <br />Walsh stated a judge will decide that. <br /> <br />McMillan stated the judge will look at the City’s findings and the record demonstrates that this lot has a <br />long track record of not being buildable. <br /> <br />Walsh stated in his view the City should give the applicant something. <br /> <br />McMillan stated it is tough on the marginal lots but that the impact on the neighborhood needs to be <br />considered. McMillan stated if the Council is going to go down this path, they may need more public <br />input since the last meeting was not about just granting one variance. McMillan noted the Council would <br />also have to grant lot area and lot width variances and not just an average lakeshore setback variance. <br />City Council Meeting April 27, 2015 Page 30 of 257