My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-27-2015 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2015
>
04-27-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2015 10:42:01 AM
Creation date
7/15/2015 10:37:25 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 13, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />__________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 21 of 40 <br /> <br />(7. #14-3686 JOHN BESSESEN AND TOM WASMOEN ON BEHALF OF DAVID <br />DELANEY, 2500 KELLEY AVENUE continued) <br /> <br />In addition, Lydiard Court and Lydiard Street have older single-family homes <br />set back from the street with large established trees, large yards, and are within walking distance to the <br />public beach on Lake Minnetonka. In addition, there is a large number of wildlife found in the area, <br />significant green space, wetlands, and close proximity to the lake. Fredrickson noted it is a quiet, serene <br />neighborhood by the lake, which they would like to see preserved. <br /> <br />Fredrickson stated the twinhome project as proposed also is in stark contrast to the well-established look <br />and feel of the neighborhood and the single-family dwellings all around it. Fredrickson stated the <br />neighbors are simply asking the developer to build single-family homes and that they are begging the City <br />Council to vote against the twinhome proposal tonight, which will allow this developer and landowner to <br />come up with appropriate single-family options. Fredrickson stated the neighbors are tired of having to <br />come here. <br /> <br />Fredrickson stated she and the other residents do not want their town to look like the mistakes being made <br />in Wayzata. Orono is not known to be easy to work with and are very tough at sticking with the <br />guidelines. Fredrickson stated what the neighbors are asking is that the Council stick with their <br />obligations and duty to keep this a beautiful place since they are responsible for protecting the look and <br />feel of this area. Fredrickson stated high density belongs in certain places and that they are saying this <br />particular lot, this steep wooded lot, is not the right place for it. <br />Fredrickson noted the Community Management Plan says this land is currently zoned LR-1B, one family <br />lakeshore residential district, which permits residential use with a minimum lot size of one acre per dry <br />buildable acre and 140-foot lot widths. This property has 3.0 dry buildable acres and is therefore zoned <br />for three one-acre single-family homes. <br /> <br />Fredrickson stated if the Council is going to approve this development, they would have to ignore the <br />following suggested guidelines, minimum requirements, and zoning laws: <br /> <br />1. The residential areas of urban Orono are primarily suitable for single-family development. <br /> <br />2. A wider range of housing types will be provided by planned residential developments of attached <br /> townhomes. These clusters or multiple family developments will be acceptable only where full <br /> urban services are available and only where the proposed density is compatible with the <br /> neighborhood and with the local environmental constraints. <br /> <br />3. Multi-family developments will generally not be considered appropriate for lands within 1,000 <br /> feet of Lake Minnetonka. Fredrickson noted this property is located 450 feet from Lake <br /> Minnetonka. Multi-family developments are also not appropriate for areas that have limited <br /> public transportation access to outside employment and shopping facilities. <br /> <br />4. In addition, County Road 15, particularly in Navarre, is far over capacity. It is not practical from <br /> an economical or environmental standpoint to expand County Road 15 to increase its capacity. <br /> Therefore, additional housing options will be primarily developed along the Highway 12 corridor <br /> in specifically identified areas that are or will be served by urban services. <br />City Council Meeting April 27, 2015 Page 23 of 257
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.