My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-13-2015 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets - Historical
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
04-13-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2015 10:35:15 AM
Creation date
7/15/2015 10:28:57 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
365
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council Work Session February 23, 2015 Page 2 <br /> <br />currently responsible for 29.5% of that roadway. The Orono City Council suggests using <br />reclamation costs as a basis for the cost sharing. The consensus was to move forward with <br />the next steps. <br /> <br />2. Code Enforcement Discussion <br />City Attorney Soren Mattick reviewed pro‐active code enforcement. Criminal code violation <br />complaints sent to his office are usually misdemeanor and currently there are three or four <br />cases to process. <br /> <br />The judicial process could be replaced by a course of action currently used by the City of <br />Burnsville. Their process is that the initial property inspection has no fee but the City charges <br />the property owner inspection fees which increase for each subsequent inspection. If the fees <br />are not paid according to Statute 429 municipalities can do a special assessment to the <br />property taxes. <br /> <br />Code violations are difficult to enforce and judges do not want to spend their time on these <br />types of citations. Walsh wants Staff to act immediately if they become aware of violations. <br />Council Member Printup is uncomfortable with proactively seeking code violation issues. <br /> <br />Planning and Zoning is reviewing City Code language to address City Codes that may need <br />amendments or revisions. Council agreed the re‐inspection fee charge used by the City of <br />Burnsville is good model and allows the City authority to assess fees that are not paid. <br /> <br />Planning and Zoning will prepare a draft for Council review of the proposed inspection fees <br />using the City of Burnsville’s model. Council also discussed that senior citizens may need <br />assistance should a City Code violation be rendered. <br /> <br />3. Prosecuting Attorney <br />Police Chief Farniok presented background information on the City’s current Prosecuting <br />Attorney Services from Ken Potts. Both Mound and Minnetonka Beach use the same <br />prosecuting attorney which makes prosecuting violations more efficient. Walsh feels that the <br />City has not been served well by the current prosecuting attorney. Council Member Cornick <br />stated that having served as an Orono Police Officer he has found Attorney Potts’ services to <br />be thorough and outstanding. Farniok reminded the group that the prosecuting attorney <br />represents the City’s best interest not the resident that has been charged. After further <br />discussion Council decided that Prosecuting Attorney Potts should attend Council meetings to <br />present updates once or twice a year and the Police Advisory Commission would discuss <br />prosecuting services. <br /> <br />4. Wellhead Protection Ordinance <br />Walsh requested more discussion on the Wellhead Protection Ordinance. Loftus stated that <br />the Wellhead Protection Ordinance was acted on at the February 9, 2015 Council meeting. <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 04/13/2015 <br />Approval of Council Work Session Minutes 03/23/15 <br />[Page 2 of 3]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.