Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 23, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />Page 11 of 18  <br />  <br />(6. #14-3700 CITY OF ORONO – AMEND CITY CODE SECTION 78-1379, SMALL WIND <br />CONVERSION SYSTEMS (WECS) SECOND REVIEW continued) <br /> <br />McMillan noted it would be 10 acres residential, five acres commercial, and a 100-foot lot line setback <br />and a 100-foot setback from the principal structure. <br /> <br />Cornick asked if shadow flicker would be removed. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated as drafted currently, the ordinance does require a shadow flicker report. <br /> <br />Cornick asked if Staff has determined whether there are any qualified people to perform the flicker report. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated Staff has not identified anyone that can do the report at this point. Gaffron stated it might <br />be possible to obtain a shadow flicker report but that at this time Staff would not be able to provide the <br />names of anyone in the local area who could provide that or the costs associated with it. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the ordinance under Option 4 currently reads that no SWECS shall be installed and <br />operated so as to cause a shadow flicker to fall on or in any existing residential property. A shadow <br />flicker report shall be prepared and required to be submitted as part of any application for a SWECS <br />permit. <br /> <br />Levang indicated she is okay with the language contained in Option 4. <br /> <br />Cornick asked if that problem could be eliminated by approving what manufacturers can be installed in <br />Orono. <br /> <br />Mattick stated the City cannot regulate the brand. <br /> <br />Cornick asked if they can offer two or three options. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated every situation is going to be different and it has to do with the specific height and location <br />of the turbine, where the neighboring house is in relation to elevation and topography as well as the <br />location of the sun at specific times of the day. Gaffron stated the only thing the Council could do is to go <br />to a model that restricts it to certain hours of the day, which would absolutely require a shadow flicker <br />report. <br /> <br />Cornick stated he would be okay with Option 4. <br /> <br />VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 1, Printup Opposed. <br /> <br />7. #15-3708 CITY OF ORONO – AMEND SECTION 78-1405 FENCES – ORDINANCE <br />NO. 140 <br /> <br />McMillan noted Staff has added to the draft some winter conditions. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated he received an e-mail from Council Member Walsh this morning suggesting that Staff <br />define what winter conditions mean in relation to temporary fencing. Item E4 states: Temporary fencing <br />shall not be allowed to remain on the property following final inspection, or issuance of a Certificate of <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 04/13/2015 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 03/23/15 <br />[Page 11 of 18]