My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-13-2015 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
04-13-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2015 10:35:15 AM
Creation date
7/15/2015 10:28:57 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
365
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 23, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 9 of 18 <br /> <br />(6. #14-3700 CITY OF ORONO – AMEND CITY CODE SECTION 78-1379, SMALL WIND <br />CONVERSION SYSTEMS (WECS) SECOND REVIEW continued) <br /> <br />Levang stated she is very firm on the 10 acres and that if it is 100 feet from the principal structure and 100 <br />feet from the lot line, she could live with that. Levang indicated she likes the 300 feet, but that does not <br />appear to be feasible. <br /> <br />Cornick stated he also is in agreement with the 10 acre minimum since it will be easier to enforce. <br /> <br />McMillan stated she is basically fine with the draft ordinance and that in her view the commercial could <br />be the same as residential. McMillan stated if there becomes an increased demand for WECS, the <br />Council can review the ordinance and make changes, but that the Council needs to make sure they are not <br />a nuisance for someone. <br /> <br />Cornick asked if it possible to set a range so that does not have to be a fixed number. <br /> <br />Mattick stated if there is a range, there would need to be a way for someone to determine what the <br />ultimate setback should be. If the Council wanted to do away with the 100-foot setback, one way to do <br />that is to say that the setback from the property line should be 1.5 times the height of the structure, which <br />would account for the fall-away zone. Mattick stated he would not advise doing a range just for the sake <br />of doing a range. Cornick stated he likes the formula option. <br /> <br />Mattick stated that is an option and that instead of requiring100 feet from the property, the Council could <br />make it 1.5 times the height of the factor, but that would make it closer to the property line. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated they could also use a factor of 2, 2.5 or 3. <br />Cornick stated it might be better to just stick with a solid number. <br /> <br />McMillan stated in her view a solid number would make things easier and would help prevent any kind of <br />shadow or flicker from occurring on the neighboring property. <br /> <br />Levang stated if someone cannot meet those setbacks, they can apply for a variance. Levang indicated <br />she is in agreement with Mayor McMillan on the commercial and that the two policies should match. <br />Levang stated at the time the City hears more requests, they can look at amending those, but at this point <br />she likes keeping them the same. <br /> <br />Printup noted the commercial areas are busier or have a more intense use. <br /> <br />Levang asked how many vacant commercial properties there are. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated depending on the definition of vacant, there are three. Gaffron stated in terms of properties <br />that have the potential to have something built on because they are currently vacant, there is the <br />office/condo site, which has individual lots that have not been built on. Gaffron noted no part of that <br />could meet the 100-foot setback and that the only 10 acre property is Morrie’s. <br /> <br />Levang stated she is comfortable at this time with having the two areas the same. <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 04/13/2015 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 03/23/15 <br />[Page 9 of 18]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.