Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 23, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />Page 7 of 18  <br />  <br />(6. #14-3700 CITY OF ORONO – AMEND CITY CODE SECTION 78-1379, SMALL WIND <br />CONVERSION SYSTEMS (WECS) SECOND REVIEW continued) <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated Exhibit C includes a variety of materials with regard to the analysis of shadow flicker. <br />A sample shadow flicker assessment is included in the Council’s packet that was completed by a <br />Minneapolis firm in Goodhue County. <br /> <br />There are a variety of software programs that analyze shadow flicker based on inputs of information <br />related to the WECS and its surroundings, such as size and height of the tower, the nature and diameter of <br />the turbine blades, and the angles between the WECS system and neighboring properties. Typically the <br />report will talk about the number of hours of flicker neighboring properties with experience each year. <br /> <br />It appears that shadow flicker analyses for large systems, such as wind farms or energy parks, are <br />relatively common, but for small individual systems, such studies are not so common and it is unclear <br />whether software packages can be geared toward small turbines and/or those not using a standard <br />horizontal blade system. <br /> <br />No local cost data has been found by Staff as of yet, but there is a firm in Michigan that will do wind <br />assessments as well as shadow flicker analysis for smaller individual systems. A widely adopted standard <br />for shadow flicker comes from Germany, and the maximum impacts allowed are 30 hours per year of <br />flickering under the worst case scenario, 30 minutes maximum on the worst day of the year, and real <br />shadow impact limited to eight hours per year. Gaffron stated it may be difficult to some extent for a <br />person to locate a firm that will actually do that analysis in this area but that it is his belief the firms <br />selling the WECS system may be able to provide that analysis. <br /> <br />The Council indicated they were more comfortable with shadow flicker text options 1 or 3, which state <br />that there must be no shadow flicker rather than some limits time of shadow flicker. <br /> <br />The Council also requested the draft be revised to allow electricity to be distributed from a SWECS to the <br />utility power grid. <br /> <br />Gaffron displayed a map of the commercial/industrial districts that is located on either side of Highway <br />12. In each case, the blue shows the area that would meet the 100-foot setback. In all but one case the <br />properties do not meet the 10-acre minimum. The only property that meets the 10-acre requirement is the <br />Morrie’s site, which is roughly 23 acres. The other lots generally tend to be less than five acres. Gaffron <br />noted he did not look at Navarre since the entire Navarre commercial district is within the Shoreland <br />where SWECS would not be allowed. <br /> <br />McMillan asked about the school zone. Gaffron stated that is located in a 2-acre residential zone, with a <br />conditional use permit being granted to allow the school use. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if that is something that should perhaps be changed in the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated the Comprehensive Plan could contain an institutional category, which would typically <br />include churches, government buildings, and schools. <br /> <br />McMillan stated a school may want to install a wind turbine. <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 04/13/2015 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 03/23/15 <br />[Page 7 of 18]