My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-13-2015 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
04-13-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2015 10:35:15 AM
Creation date
7/15/2015 10:28:57 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
365
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 23, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 5 of 18 <br /> <br />(5. #14-3690 FRED JOHNSON (CD PURCHASER), PATRICIA PFEFFER (SELLER), 1565 <br />ORCHARD BEACH PLACE continued) <br /> <br />proposing a large house but that the applicants would be held to the normal two and a half stories. Staff <br />has preliminarily concluded that the basement as proposed may be considered a story. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated based on all of that, it is hard for Staff to define what the best setback to vary from is. The <br />average lakeshore setback is the most important one and the Council has been pretty strict on adhering to <br />the average lakeshore setback over the years. Gaffron noted the lot is the smallest lot in the neighborhood <br />and consists of roughly two-tenths of an acre. The proposed house would be significantly smaller than <br />the other homes in the neighborhood. <br /> <br />McMillan stated in order to construct a house on this lot the setbacks would need to be very small. <br />McMillan stated the applicants pretty much cannot construct a house without some type of setback <br />variance. McMillan stated in her view the two things that she cannot overcome on this application is the <br />fact that the lot is small, which is out of character with the neighborhood, and the average lakeshore <br />setback. McMillan noted the proposed house would be very far into that average lakeshore setback. <br /> <br />McMillan noted there is a track record going back into the late 1960s of this lot being deemed <br />unbuildable. McMillan stated there is a significant amount of documentation depicting that and whoever <br />purchased this lot was basically buying an unbuildable lot that they could use perhaps to launch a canoe <br />or swim off of. McMillan stated given that, she is in agreement with Staff’s recommendation. <br /> <br />Council Member Levang indicated she also is in agreement with Staff’s recommendation. Levang stated <br />if that many trees are removed, there will be tremendous damage to the environment as well as changing <br />the sight lines for the neighbors. Levang stated she does not feel a house of this size fits into the character <br />of the neighborhood since it will be strikingly small compared to the other homes. Levang indicated she <br />is not in favor of granting an average lakeshore setback since the City Council is very mindful of that and <br />has always adhered to that. Levang stated she is in favor of denial. <br /> <br />Council Member Cornick noted he is new to the City Council and that the Council is sometimes asked to <br />do difficult things. Cornick stated he sympathizes with the applicants but that it appears the Council is <br />being asked to do something impossible and that there is no way they can approve this. Cornick stated he <br />would have to agree with the Planning Commission and Staff’s recommendation. <br /> <br />Levang moved, Cornick seconded, to direct Staff to prepare a denial resolution for Application <br />No. 14-3690, Fred Johnson and Patricia Pfeffer, 1565 Orchard Beach Place. <br /> <br />Printup stated this application reminds him of the application on Maple Place and the discussion <br />regarding the Alness application. Printup asked how this application is different from those two <br />situations. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated this application is different because the applicant is requesting variances to the City Code. <br />In those other instances, the property owners were able to meet those requirements. Gaffron stated even <br />if a “park model” approximately 10’ x 40’ is placed on the lot, they still could not meet the average <br />lakeshore setback. Gaffron stated the difference between this application and the Maple Place properties <br /> <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 04/13/2015 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 03/23/15 <br />[Page 5 of 18]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.