|
• j , ,�'',',.-','/''''',-,-1,,,t-,'' ti } ti r;, eY 3J r?r Z'tiF: ",i `,'''.`,,-/-*:'
<br /> `,,- ti ) '. {:r * i ' i',,, ,,',„41 t�� r r { ✓P fCfit � � '/ u `` ��,
<br /> j r� �T ra,,�+,, I ,
<br /> 1 tt
<br /> . ,. , , ''."1:' ''' ' '''''' . ' '.:
<br /> , c
<br /> f ' The board finds that the variances granted do not alter the essential character c,'
<br /> 'A of the locality. The proposed dock is in a residential area, and the nature and size
<br /> iia° tic:
<br /> ,�; of the proposed facility will not be out of scale with other residential dock and boat
<br /> storage along the shoreline. The Runkle and Kauffmann Sites each have ;
<br /> approximately 100 feet of shoreline. Therefore, adding storage for two boats at the
<br /> combined Revier and Amundson Sites will not create unreasonable congestion in the
<br /> t area.
<br /> G.
<br /> Mr. Runkle asserts that a variance may not be granted to Mr. Revier which •
<br /> allows him to install a dock or store boats on the Runkle side of the extended line
<br /> between the Runkle and Revier Sites. This question is more fully addressed in the
<br /> attached memorandum. For the reasons explained in the memorandum, the board
<br /> makes no finding as to the respective real property interests of the owners of the
<br /> Runkle and Revier Sites.
<br /> Mr. Runkle stated that he would agree to a dock plan which would not involve sl;
<br /> •
<br /> crossing the extended lot line between the Runkle and the Revier Sites. He argues '{ ,,
<br /> • that there is no hardship which justifies a variance adjusting this lot line because a
<br /> dock has been in place in the past which did not extend over the extended lot line.
<br /> It appears to be true that a dock has been constructed in the past at the Revier or
<br /> Amundson Site which did not extend beyond the extended lot line between the
<br /> , Runkle and Revier Sites. However, this dock was not in compliance with the
<br /> requirements of the LMCD code and extended substantially into the dock use area of
<br /> the Kauffmann Site.
<br /> Likewise, Mr. Runkle urges the board to adopt a plan agreed upon by Mr.
<br /> q, ,;s Revier and Mr. Runkle in an attempt to resolve this issue through mediation. That ,,
<br /> ' agreement, however, also avoided crossing Mr. Runkle's extended lot line at the
<br /> i„`....14,4,
<br /> t'° ,, } `n° expense of the Kauffman Site, and Mr. Kauffmann apparently declined to approve
<br /> " r the proposed settlement. 'i
<br /> } e
<br /> t ,.
<br /> F.
<br /> 1 CLL60201 L,'
<br /> LX110-6 3 „.V'1
<br /> 'iYs ” t
<br />
|