My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-13-2014 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
01-13-2014 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2015 9:51:22 AM
Creation date
7/15/2015 9:51:02 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, January 13, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 2 of 17 <br />(3. GREEN TREES ROAD SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION – RESOLUTION NO. 6358, <br />Continued) <br /> <br />The existing conditions of Green Trees Road consist of a private street that serves six residential projects. <br />Each property has an onsite sewage disposal system which consists of a septic tank and a drain field. The <br />existing municipal sanitary sewer system is located on Shoreline Drive, and as part of the feasibility <br />study, the condition and capacity of that sewer line was looked at. It was ultimately determined that the <br />municipal system does have the capacity to serve the properties on Green Trees Road. <br /> <br />The feasibility study proposes two alternates for extending sewer from the existing gravity sewer on the <br />eastside of Shoreline Drive. Alternate 1 proposes a 2-inch forcemain and Alternate 2 proposes an 8-inch <br />gravity sewer. Alternate 2 would eventually eliminate the need for the pump stations. Martini noted that <br />a gravity system is generally preferred over a forcemain due to the long-term costs associated with <br />maintaining the pump stations. Both alternates are proposed to be constructed by use of trenchless <br />construction methods to minimize the need for reconstruction <br /> <br />Martini indicated under the forcemain option, it is possible, even with the trenchless construction, to put <br />some curves in the alignment of the pipe. Martini stated the alignment of the sewer would stay within the <br />existing right-of-way until you get to the end of the cul-de-sac. Martini noted it would be necessary to <br />obtain an easement from the property owners to extend the sewer to each of the properties from the cul- <br />de-sac. <br /> <br />Alternative two is the gravity sewer option. The project would start essentially at the same point on <br />Shoreline Drive but would require straight lines and a manhole where the alignment would be turned. <br />Under this alternate, the contractor would not able to follow the curvature of the road and would require <br />an additional easement. <br /> <br />Martini noted Alternative 1 is significantly less expensive than Alternative 2 and the directional drilling is <br />able to provide some curvature on the alignment of the road. Martini noted near the intersection of <br />Shoreline Drive and Green Trees Road there are some Indian burial mounds and that Staff has been in <br />contact with Indian Affairs to make sure the proposed construction is taking that sensitive area into proper <br />consideration. <br /> <br />Martini stated the proposed alignment was picked in an attempt to minimize the number of easements <br />required, but noted for the northern properties, it will be necessary to cross some other properties. Jesse <br />Struve will be working with those property owners in order to obtain the necessary easements. In <br />addition, Martini indicated they did look at setbacks and buildable areas and Staff does not believe the <br />proposed extension impacts any of the buildable areas on the properties. The estimated cost as presented <br />in the feasibility study for Alternative 1 was $123,600, with the idea that the costs would be 100 percent <br />assessed to the benefitting properties for an individual cost of $20,600. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.