Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 13, 2020 <br />6:03 o'clock p.m. <br />Walsh clarified that the scenario is if someone has 49 yards but has 6,000 square feet that is being <br />disturbed, one says that a permit is required and the other says that a permit is not required. Theoretically, <br />someone could say they have 49 cubic yards and so they do not need a permit because it says "or." <br />Barnhart stated they would need a permit <br />Walsh referenced the language indicating that basically someone would not need a permit because they <br />have less than 50 cubic yards because of the word "or." <br />Barnhart said the last portion of the table is not in the code and is just for the City Council's reference. <br />Johnson and Barnhart discussed the language used in the code and what would be more helpful and said <br />the activity for permitting and the activity for interim use is in the code but the "no permit" language is <br />not in the code. <br />Walsh asked if the "no permit" language was just for the City Council's information and that what is in <br />the code is the information above that area on the displayed document. <br />Barnhart agreed and asked Mattick if there was language to make it more clear. <br />Mattick referenced the language about grading, import, export, and stockpiling that is in the code and <br />noted the summary is not in the code, so he does not necessarily see the conflict. Ile said Barnhart <br />attempted to summarize when a permit is required. <br />Walsh said it is a clarification to make sure that the summary is not handed out to anybody, and the "or" <br />could be changed to "and," but it does not change the code that is being changed. <br />Johnson noted the chart is very good and it is information that needs to be in the code. The chart would be <br />helpful to residents, but the City does not want them to find a loophole. If the chart is used, it needs to be <br />cleaned up. <br />Johnson said the City is exceeding DNR standards in some areas and asked if there was a reason for that. <br />Barnhart stated tree replacement is the area where the City exceeded the DNR requirements, where there <br />is a prohibition against clearing and removal of large trees in the 0-75. He indicated the Planning <br />Commission wanted some tiers in place: the bigger the tree, the more tree replacement. The way it is <br />written now, it is more on the discretion of Staff. The City felt more comfortable having it written down. <br />Johnson moved, Seals seconded, to approve LAI9-000091 — City Of Orono Text Amendment No. <br />243, Third Series Related to Grading and Land Alterations with the caveat that if the chart is <br />published, that the chart be evaluated to make sure that it is clear. VOTE: Ayes 5 (Johnson, <br />Crosby, Printup, Seals, Walsh), Nays 0. <br />CITY ENGINEERIPUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR REPORT <br />13. BIG ISLAND PARK ADA TRAIL PROJECT (19-033) - AWARD PLANNING <br />DEPARTMENT REPORT <br />Page 7 of 25 <br />