My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-13-2020 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2020-2024
>
2020
>
04-13-2020 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2023 11:18:57 AM
Creation date
4/28/2020 3:22:45 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 13, 2020 <br />6:03 o'clock p.m. <br />Mr. Anderson noted the City, as owner, can require 10 feet off of each side setback, which would <br />coincide with LMCD rules. It looks like the applicant is trying to get 2 boats there, and it specifically says <br />it is 1 boat per 50 feet if you don't own the property. He noted the Browns, the next application up for <br />discussion, have only had 1 boat there. The dock that was put in is for the property to the east, which is Al <br />Shatslee's, and has only had 1 boat there. <br />Walsh said if they owned both boats, they would be fine. <br />Mr. Anderson stated the regulations indicate 1 boat per 50 feet if the applicant does not own the property; <br />they do not own the property. <br />Walsh noted the City requires the applicant to follow the LMCD rules. <br />Mr. Anderson stated that is the rule he received from the LMCD Director. <br />Crosby indicated the City lists that rule in the Dock Site License Agreement. <br />Seals said when she looked through the documents, it looked like there were multiple boat licenses for <br />each dock, which would apparently conflict with the information in the LMCD rules. She feels it is <br />concerning that 1 dock is already in. <br />Walsh noted that what is in front of the Council today is that applications are approved subject to <br />following the LMCD rules. He said if they want to flout the rules and the potential of losing their license, <br />that is the decision the applicants can make. <br />Printup said the City made it very clear that the applicants can lose their license and that they are not <br />starting out very well. He has no problem whether something or nothing is there. He encouraged everyone <br />to please follow the correct process, because he can vote no very easily. <br />Seals stated there are 2 different boat licenses on the application and asked Barnhart to confirm or deny <br />her understanding. <br />Barnhart said the applicant identified 2 boats that would be docked on the dock. One of the conditions of <br />the agreement is that it must comply with LMCD rules and regulations. <br />Seals stated that the applicant had to choose 1 of the boats. <br />Walsh said regardless of the request, the City can still approve the license based on the applicant <br />following the LMCD rules, which states they get 1 boat. They can pick 1 boat or no boats, but if they pick <br />2, then they lose their license potentially or have to correct the issue within the appropriate time frame. <br />Mr. Anderson stated he verified the rules with the Administrator. He did not think there would be an issue <br />with the LMCD approving a new license. He said there needs to be a better drawing showing that it is 10 <br />feet off the sidelines and the dock is no more than 60 feet, which sets things up for the other docks. <br />Crosby agreed with Mr. Anderson. <br />Walsh said the City's rules are clear in the license. <br />Page 4 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.