My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-09-2020 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2020-2024
>
2020
>
03-09-2020 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2020 10:55:07 AM
Creation date
4/1/2020 10:54:59 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday, March 9,2020 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> 18. LA19-000102—KEVIN CLARK OB/O YMCA GREATER TWIN CITIES, 135 ORONO <br /> ORCHARD ROAD <br /> Barnhart said this was a sketch plan review for property owned by Gordon James Construction. They are <br /> proposing a five-lot subdivision and the property owner has a plan which meets the City's Ordinances. <br /> Generally,the lots meet the size requirements of 2 acres of drive/buildable. The middle lot is challenging <br /> in that there are steep slopes and substantial vegetation. A couple lots don't meet the width requirements, <br /> but that is easily remedied. The new road appears to meet the requirements for width and length, and the <br /> cul-de-sac meets the City Ordinances. Because Lot 1 has frontage on Orono Orchard Road,that is <br /> technically the front yard; the width, measured at the front yard setback, is approximately 50 feet. <br /> COuncilmelnbers and Barnhart discussed options regarding Lot 1 given the lot's configurations. <br /> Barnhart said Lot 2 also does not meet the lot width requirement, which is not uncommon and is seen <br /> quite a bit when looking at cul-de-sac lots. One option would be to extend the outlot to get additional <br /> frontage on Lot 1. That may impact a portion of Lot 4 or Lot 5. <br /> Walsh indicated the property presents its own practical difficulty because of the layout. <br /> Councilmembers and Staff discussed the location of the easement through Lot 3 and whether anything <br /> was underneath it.Barnhart stated he does not believe so, based on Orono's and Long Lake's utility maps, <br /> but would need to look at the language of the easement to see if it could be moved. <br /> Barnhart indicated he is looking for reaction to the layout and the road network and if the Council sees <br /> any red flags other than what he mentioned. He knows more detail will be necessary including septic <br /> sites, grading, and the road plan. <br /> Johnson asked whose easement it was. <br /> Barnhart stated it might be the Met Council. <br /> Seals suggested learning more about the easement. She said she likes the plan much better than the earlier <br /> one and likes the fact that every lot is different. She said it is going in the right direction. <br /> Walsh, Crosby, and Johnson agreed with Seals. <br /> Mr. John Quinlivan, Gordon James Construction, 5159 Main Street,Maple Plain,explained they have <br /> talked about taking the triangle on the front,bend the road a little, and dedicate the corner to a monument. <br /> He stated the lot line between Lot 1 and Lot 2 could be moved far enough to do a swap and still be within <br /> the appropriate numbers. <br /> Johnson asked if that would keep Lot l at 2 acres. <br /> Mr. Quinlivan said it would keep Lot 1 at 2 acres by rotating the line. He noted there is not a lot of room <br /> to play around with lot lines, so the final rendition will be close to what the sketch plan is. <br /> No action was taken at this time. <br /> Page 11 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.