My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-13-2006 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2006
>
03-13-2006 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2015 2:19:08 PM
Creation date
7/14/2015 2:18:25 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
379
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
n2rNVTrs or Tlr� //) <br /> � 0120N0 PLANNING COlY1MISSION '� � <br /> Mond�3�, September 19,2005 ��U C V . <br /> G:UO o'clock p.m. ���' S <br /> �., <br /> 13remer indicai:ed sl�e also is in agreen�ent�x�ith the commen.Cs of Leslie, bul tl�a.t sl�e does have some <br /> questions for lhe parlcing consullant. 13remer slated i:l�e Planning Cominission is only able lo deal���iih <br /> the application that is before thenl to�iight and not the overall possible filtzrre development of this area. <br /> Bremer conunented historically the are� of Navarre h�s not seen a lot of redevelol�ment and thal in her <br /> opinion this expansion is ri�lit for Navarce. Bremer stated in lier opinion once an �pplication is pendiug, � <br /> law c�nnot be iil7posed on that a.pplication arid would be subject to the la���s tllat exist�t tlie tiine the <br /> a�pIication is submiited. }3remer siated the inoratorium is important in her nund Uut tliat it does not apply <br /> in this sitiialion. <br /> Bremer stated she would be iii agreement with increasing the height of the back wall to eight feet if tl7at <br /> would help address the noise concenls. Breiiler stated t11e parking proUlem cannot be ignored but in her <br /> view it is not en�ugli to stop this application fi•om going forward to tlle Council. <br /> 7im Benshoof, Benshoof&Associates, stated the Uasic question of parking adequacy is very valid and <br /> that there are tlu�ee ways to approach that question. Benshoof stated one approach is to ask whether this <br /> proposal iiiakes sense, and the secoiid ap�roach is to ask whetlier the parking sh.tdy addresses the current <br /> and future parking needs of the area. Tlle third approach would Ue to rely more specifically on a code <br /> reviev��. Benshoof indicated he would be able to speak to ihat question,but he would prefer to speak to <br /> tlie ini-uilive approach to the parking. <br /> 13enshoof sCated according to City Code, this expai�sion would require 63 spots. Benshoof staCed ihe <br /> greates�demand for parking from ihis establishment is in the evening llouis and that the study <br /> deulonslraled at pealc demand Cimes tlial�l�e Narrow's Saloon«�ould require less Cl�an half of tlie��arlcii}g <br /> that is available in tlie area. T3enshoof slaCed in Ilis view this expansion does ulake sense in terms of the <br /> parkiug. 13enshoof revie���e�i the peak demaiid tin�es fo��parking for Cl�e Narrow's Saloon and poinled ouC <br /> tllat their si:uely does account for an incrcase in the��ark-n-ride of six p�rkiilg slalls as well as an increased <br /> I'AG� 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.