Laserfiche WebLink
FILE#06-3176 <br /> 3 February 2006 � <br /> Page 4 of 4 <br /> standards, as it will be difficult to achieve 25% on this 60' lakeshore lot without reducing - <br /> the house/garage footprint down to 1,200 s.f. —�ssuming the minimum required driveway <br /> and sidewalk widths and a inodest 10'x15' deck. However, while the applicant has <br /> proposed 14.2% Stl'L1CtL1Tc1I coverage is it re�sonable to "max out" the 15% structural <br /> footprint when a hardcover variance is requested? Staff would reason that the overall <br /> footprint of the home is below the 15% struciural limit and may result in a more <br /> reasonable level of 75' —250' hardcover. <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> Other than the City �ngineer's issues are there any other issues or concerns with this <br /> application? <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Planning Staff recommends approval of the lot width and lot area variances, and some <br /> level of hardcover variance within the 75' — 250' zone as the Planning Commission <br /> determines appropriate. The applicants should assure that the proposed home meet the <br /> City's height limit of 30' and 2.5 stories. Additionally, staff would add a condition that <br /> the property owners comply with the City Engineer's recommendations. <br /> 4 <br />