Laserfiche WebLink
FILE#05-3136 <br /> 17 February 2006 <br /> ' Page 5 of 5 <br /> Issues for Consider�ition <br /> 1. The proposed driveway is 20' from the south lot line, leaving ample room for <br /> vegetative screening, althou�h Lulder the new plan the retaining walls and house are <br /> reduced to a magnitude where such screening may not need to be maudltory save for <br /> the average setback issue. Does PC finci the need to require screening? <br /> 2. Does Plaiuling Commission have any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Staff recommends approval of the lot width variance. Staff reconunends appi•oval of the <br /> average setback variance, subject to confirmation that the neighbors do izot object to the <br /> proposed house location. Staff finds that the thresholds established in the Zoning Code <br /> for requiring a land alteration CUP are not suipassed with tlus proposal, hence no such <br /> CUP is required. <br /> 5 <br />