My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-27-2006 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2006
>
02-27-2006 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2015 1:59:51 PM
Creation date
7/13/2015 1:59:21 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF TFIE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSTON MEETING <br /> - Nlondly, November 21, 2005 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> #05-3161 LOREN FRITZ, CONTINUED) <br /> cleaned that area out but it continues to back up with sediment. Dobratz stated they are not concerned <br /> about the retaining wall and the view fi-om the road. <br /> Rahn commented the City Engineer would be reviewing the retaining wall and driveway. <br /> Marl<Dobrartz stated there are hardwood ti•ees growing in that area that they are calling a wetland. <br /> Gundlacli stated wetlands are not always detei�nined on whether they contain water. Gundlach stated <br /> wetlands are delineated based on approximately 10 different factors. <br /> Faith CIu-istine, 3925 North Shore Drive, stated she is delighted that the Fritz's bought and tore down the <br /> eyesore on the corner and that this project will be an improvement to the neighborhood in her opinion. <br /> Angela Williams, 1675 Shady�vood Road, questioned the access to the property fi�om Shadywood and <br /> ho�v far back that driveway goes. <br /> Gundlach stated the Shadywood Road access�vill remain in the exact same location and that there is no <br /> intention to remove the house on that lot. <br /> Williains conunented she does not feel this application will be a problem. <br /> The public hearing was closed. <br /> Rahn stated he would like to see a landscape plan for this development at the next meeting. <br /> Bremer inquired whether the Planning Comnussion would be in favor of the seven-foot easement. <br /> Gaffi•on indicated a few years ago Hennepin County adopted a trail plan and they concluded that a seven- <br /> foot easement should be granted at the time of platting of properties if a trail is called for in that area. <br /> Gaffi-on stated if a city does not dedicate the additional right-of-�uay at the time of platting, the city would <br /> be required to pay a greater share for the acquisition of the easement. <br />_ Gaffi•on stated historically the City has taken the position that easements should be negotiated between <br /> the property o�vner and the county, with the property owner receiving compensation for that easement. <br /> Bremer commented she genez�ally is in support of that philosophy but pointed out in this case the <br /> seven-foot easement would not impact the size conFonnance of the lots. <br />. Jurgens stated he is in support of the seven-foot easement. <br /> Ralu1 stated there might be more of a need in this situation for the easement given the close proximity to <br /> the interseclion. <br /> PAG� 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.