Laserfiche WebLink
#OS-3161 <br /> Feb►•u;try 16,2006 <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br /> List of Exhibits _ <br /> Eahibit A—Loucks Letter 2-1-06 <br /> E�hibit B —Revised Plan Set <br /> Sheet C1-1: Eaisting Conditions Plan <br /> Sheet C2-1: Preliminary Site Plan <br /> Sheet C3-1: Preliminaiy Grading Plan � <br /> SheeC C3-2: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPP) <br /> Sheet C4-1: Preliminary Utility Plan <br /> Sheet C6-1: Preliminary Plat <br /> Sheet C8-1: Project Details <br /> Exhibit C—Loucks Transmittal Letters 12-22-05, 1-11-06 <br /> Exhibit D—City�ngineer Comments 12-30-05, 1-6-06, 1-17-06, 1-18-06 <br /> E�:hibit E—MCWD Wetland Delineation Approval 11-22-OS <br /> Eahibit F—PC Action Notice 11-22-OS <br /> Exhibit G—Draft PC Minutes 11-21-OS <br /> Exhibit H—Memo and E�:hibits of 11-17-OS <br /> Exhibit I - Site Airphoto <br /> ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION <br /> Park Conuliission Review Pendin� <br /> The CMP indicates a fitture trail along North Shore Drive and Shadywood Road. The <br /> CMP has not indicated which side of the road the trails are platu�ed for but it does <br /> indicate the trail would be on the shoulder or separated. The Park Con-ullission has not <br /> yet reviewed or conunented on the proposed plat with relation to required park dedication <br /> and whether cash and/or land dedication will be required. Land dedication if required <br /> would likely be a 10' easement along the Shadywood and North Shore Drive frontages. <br /> Such easement would not impact the lot sizes or fiulctionality because it would be over <br /> the requued drainage and utility easements, and dedication of the easement would not <br /> reduce tl�e Park Dedication Fee wluch would be $11,100.00 in total for the two new back <br /> lots (Lots l, 2 and 5 contain or until recently contained existing homes). <br /> Review of Retainin�Wall ScreeninQ Proposal The applicant has submitted a proposal <br /> for screening the retaining wall in Outlot B. See Sheet C8-1 and the February 1 letter <br /> from Loucks. The proposal consistes primarily of use of dark color earth tone block and <br /> an ivy planting. Platuiing Conuilission should determine whether this is acceptable. <br /> Staff recommends approval. Note also that the driveway in Outlot B (Sheet C2-1) has <br /> been shifl;ed to the east to allow for a 10' setback, aud the one-tier wall at that point will <br /> be 5' from the lot line. <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Subject to any additional comments by the City Engineer, and subject to Plaiuiing <br /> Comnlission acceptance of the retaining wall screening proposal, staPl' i•ecommends <br /> granting preliminary plat �pproval. This item will also be forwarded to the Park <br /> Commission for comment as soon as possible. <br />