|
. �` ��
<br /> >�..._.�
<br /> " � ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING h�q .;��,�, y,� �,�,�
<br /> � MONDAY, NOVENIBER 24, 2003
<br /> .,�`
<br /> LMCD REPURT—LILI MCMILLAN,REP1tESENTATIVE ,��°`
<br /> �'`yi
<br /> ��\ p �� Sheriff's
<br /> McMillan stated that�they had their annual meeting with the Henne in County
<br /> Water Patrol, which erlforces the LMCD code on te Jul k4�' b�oating i c��ident�Therenwas a
<br /> went well. They had a sa�fe summer, except for th y _
<br /> significant increase in BUI'`s., with 67 in 2003 vs. 22 in 2002.���`One possible cause would
<br /> be the good weather. The wafie,r patrol camasegn atations,avith 87�in 2003�vs.3 Oan 002•
<br /> on the lake, which led to a signifi.cant mcre ,.
<br /> Licensed deputy and special patrol�hours totaled 4;500 on Lake Minnetonka, which came
<br /> to about 85% of enforcement time for,the entire county. The percentage time was
<br /> consistent with what they've done in tlie.�past. T 1 n 8 Oain 2003.STheylfeltp 31was a
<br /> (volunteers), which is down with their�hours tota g
<br /> good number of special deputies.,,Hennepin°County has not yet determined if they'll fund
<br /> enough of the budget to haverthe two extra deputies next summer as well. They should
<br /> know by the end of December. =,Y
<br /> ,, _ �.
<br /> Murphy asked if the��ncrease in BUI has to do with incr�ased enforcement. McMillan
<br /> stated they had the same number of deputies last stunmer.�,ansevere stated he believed
<br /> they stepped.up enforcement of BUI after the Big Island probrezns over July 4th.
<br /> �f��` �;'��L. �
<br /> w�. .,'�
<br /> pTTBLIC COMMENTS ��
<br /> � �= �','�.
<br /> .,:,� ..,�
<br /> ..y
<br /> ,,�'� None.
<br /> �,,.f' �...�....:.."�.aw.w_��,,..�_...:,...,.�.,.�..,..r.m�._v.:,,...�:.y._.._,.��.���,.a:�....:,�.__,�,�..�......_:.� _
<br /> _,_.,.w. - -- 1�-�._��.�.,.....y,
<br /> �.�..J::..�.-.�.,,��.
<br /> �� _� . ._ _
<br /> ZONING ADMINISTR.ATOR'5 REPORT
<br /> 3. #02-2829 Orono Zoning Code and N nconforming StguctureRsegulation of
<br /> Nonconforming Us
<br /> Gaffron stated that the Planrung Commission had been working on this Zoning Code
<br /> amendment for about two years. The intent was to add standards for nonconforri�ing
<br /> structures. The current draft was reviewed by the Plannin� Commission at a Public
<br /> . Hearing held on November 17 . They recommended approyal with a unanimous vote.
<br /> The draft accomplishes three things: a purP°es andtnonconforming1structure�s.dIt sep ates
<br /> section, and standards for nonconfonming
<br /> the provisions pertaining to "Nonconforming Uses" from those pertaining to
<br /> "Nonconforming Structures." It eliminates language that makes the existing section
<br /> pertinent only to uses, not structun S'use of land not hnvo 1 ing atstrue�ture or nvolv n�ta
<br /> provision for lawful nonconformi g
<br /> structure with value less than $3000 on 1-1-75. It eliminates language that suggests
<br /> Council would look favorably on the granting of vanances r,vhere a situation existed
<br /> legally under laws prior to 1975. It distinguishes between "Involuntary Destruction" and
<br /> 2
<br />
|