My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-27-2006 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2006
>
02-27-2006 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2015 1:59:51 PM
Creation date
7/13/2015 1:59:21 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
We agree that language should remain discouraging metal buildings, but <br /> allowing the use of inetals and other appropriate materials as �ccenis. <br /> 4) 78-827, C, 2, page 11. This section needs revision. We recommend the <br /> following: "Parlcing a�ld drive aisles shall be set back � minimum of 10 feet <br /> fi�onl all buildings to provide a space for landscaping a11d sidewalks. Parlcing <br /> �nd di-ive aisles may be located directly adjacent to buildings in rear and sicie <br /> ylyds wllich do not abut ptiblic streets or are fiilly screened fc•om view of the <br /> public right of way. Truck circulation areas nlay be located directly adjacent <br /> to bliildings where the property owner demonstrates that the proposed tr�ick <br /> circulation lrea will be screeiied from view of the pitblic right of way." <br /> 5) 78-829, A, page 15. We would propose that the last sentence read as follows <br /> "Screening shall �lso be pi-ovided along the frontage of such business or <br /> industrial parking areas that �re dii-ectly across the street from 1 residentill <br /> zone." <br /> 6) 78-832, A, Wall Signs, 1, page 19. There should be some recognition that the <br /> building fa�ade facing a public right of way may �iot Ue the only, or main, <br /> "fi•ont" of a building, or that tllere may Ue more than one side of a building <br /> facing a public right of way. Owners and users reasonably expect to be able to <br /> put wall signs (within limits) ou the fi•ont(s)/main entrance(s) of their <br /> buildings. <br /> We would propose here that the language be revised as follows: <br /> Wall signs <br /> 1. On the fi•ont of building: <br /> a. The fi-ont of the building shall Ue defined as the wall of the <br /> building with the main entrance(s). <br /> b. Overall sign area of five (5) percent of the total building fi-ont <br /> fa�ade area. <br /> c. A maximum of 100 square feet per tenant signage. <br /> 2. Not on the front of building: <br /> a. Signage shall be allowed on a building wall other than tlle fi•ont if <br /> the wall faces a street or there is a puUlic entrance on that side of <br /> the building. <br /> b. Overall sign area of five (5) percent of the total building fi•ont <br /> fa�ade area. <br /> c. A maximum oF l 00 squlre feet�er tenant signage. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.