My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-13-2006 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2006
>
02-13-2006 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2021 11:00:59 AM
Creation date
7/13/2015 1:33:46 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
524
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
#06-3146 <br /> February 9,2006 <br /> Page 2 <br /> Planning Commission Recommendation <br /> On January 17,2006 Planning Commission on a vote of 5-0 recommended denial of the variances as <br /> requested, but reconunended approval of variances only to the e�tent of the prior approval of July <br /> 2002, i.e.: <br /> - garage size 22 x 34 (748 s.£) (no greater than 750 s.£) <br /> - must meet 5' side setback <br /> - Hardcover not to exceed 34.1% (3,435 s.f.) in 75-250' zone,not to exceed 45.86% (1,447 s.£)in <br /> 250-500' zone. <br /> Discussion <br /> In essence, the Plaiuiing Commission recoinmended denial of the requested variances, but <br /> recommended approval for a simple renewal of the level of variances granted in 2002.The applicant <br /> has indicated he is willing to proceed under the conditions reconunended by the Planning <br /> Commission,but he may revise the dimensions of the garage slightly, keeping it below 750 s.f. and <br /> meeting the 5' setback(it could change to 23 x 32.5 or 21 x 35.5,for example). This is acceptable to <br /> staff, as long as the driveway is designed to ineet minimum standards, and an acceptable grading <br /> plan is provided. <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Staff recommeiids approval per the Planning Comrnission recommendation,subj ect to the coiidition <br /> that a site plan meeting the required conditions must be submitted for staff approval prior to final <br /> Council action, and likewise a grading and drainage plan acceptable to the City Engineer will be <br /> required before final Council action. <br /> COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br /> If Council concurs with the PC recommendation,Table,directing applicant to provide a revised site <br /> plan and grading & drainage plans for City review, and direct staff to bring this back with a <br /> resolution for approval once those plans have been submitted and are found acceptable. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.