My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-13-2006 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2006
>
02-13-2006 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2021 11:00:59 AM
Creation date
7/13/2015 1:33:46 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
524
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE � <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday, January 23, 2006 . <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> 11'Iaureen ?? , neighbors to the development, pointed out that 1.7 feet between the noi7iial and <br /> high water seemed somewhat conseivative and questioned how this would affect tl�eir alteniate <br /> septic site. I�i addition, they expressed conceni that the nuip pond miglit end up spilling over onto <br /> the northwest conier of their property as there was little margin between normal and reality. <br /> Kellogg stated that, at first brush, he will need to look at additional di•awings and calculatio�ls from <br /> their yard as well as the one provided by Bohland and identify an outlet structure. <br /> Maureen , stated that, though she did not have an overall objection to the location of the pond, <br /> the water typically runs east to west and overflows into their yard. She encouraged the City to take <br /> a careful look at the calculations before they proceed. <br /> Sansevere asked staff whether they were comfortable�•anting conditional support at this time. <br /> Gaffron stated that the City Engineer needs to be allowed adequate review of the proposal before <br /> the Council grants approval, though if comfortable, the Council could grant conditional approvals <br /> despite the fact that MCWD approvals are necessary as well. <br /> Bohland stated that, in general, he was confident this proposal would work once it could be <br /> deternlined that it does nat impact the neighbors adversely. The pond could be elongated etc. <br /> Muiphy asked whether there was agreement among the Council that this was the oi�ly remaining <br /> issue, the engineering of the pond. As he was aware that it took a great deal of effort to assemble <br /> the various niembers far a meeting last week. <br /> Bohland stated that once the city grants preliminary plat approval, the watershed will in earnest <br /> begin their review. He hoped that they would be able to gain preliminary plat approval this eveiling <br /> contingent upon engineer Kellogg's comments. <br /> Gaffron stated that he would be more comfortable to get all the final details wrapped up before the <br /> next meetin�in 3 �veeks and grant approval at that time. <br /> PAGE 9 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.