My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-13-2006 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2006
>
02-13-2006 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2021 11:00:59 AM
Creation date
7/13/2015 1:33:46 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
524
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. m�i�vu r�cs or T� <br /> ORONO PLANMNG COMMISSYON M�ETTNG <br /> Tucsctay, Ja��uary 17,2006 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> Sundy stated he did not. <br /> Leslie inquired�vhy gutters would not solve this problem. <br /> Sundy indicated there�vas a gutter on the residence previously but that in a heavy downpour the water <br /> overflows the gutter and it was not sufficient for taking the water away from that area. <br /> Leslie inquired whether a larger gulter could be installed. <br /> Sundy stated his builder recommended the covered entryway. <br /> Jurgens stated diverters could also Ue utiJized and that there are some other options that could Ue <br /> explored. Jurgens stated in his vie�v guiters could resolve this sih.iation. <br /> Bremer noted an application silnilar to this was approved on Fagerness Point. <br /> Winkey stated he does not have a problem with the application given the issues that need to Ue addressed. <br /> Jurgens inquired�vhat the area on top of the covered entryrvay is. <br /> Sundy stated the fence is merely for aesthetics and was put on there by the architect. Sundy stated there is <br /> not a decic located in that area. Sundy pointed out they are covering an existing hardcover surface and <br /> that no netiv hardcover�vould be created. <br /> Jurgens commented the water�vould be diverted elsewhere and would lilcely still cause problems. <br /> Sundy stated a gutter would be installed on the overhang. <br /> ICempf stated he is in agreement with Commissioner Winl<ey. Kempf stated sh-uctural coverage has a lot <br /> to do with the massing and that there are some lots where this type of covered enhyway would be more <br /> noticeable. Kempf stated the intrusion is on the inside angle of the L where it would have minimal <br /> impact. Kempf noted there is not an adjoining residence on the side this eniryway is being constnicted <br /> and that in his vie�v the applicant has provided sufftcient evidence depicting the need for a covered <br /> enir}n.vay. <br /> Bremer noted the applicant has submitted a letter, four photographs, a��d a pest control invoice. Bren�er <br /> staled iil Izer vie�v tllis applicant has�nade a compelling case for the covered entry�vay. <br /> 1'AG� 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.