Laserfiche WebLink
, #OS-3131 <br /> December 8,2005 <br /> Page 5 <br /> F. Lot Layout and Lot Stand�rds (RPUD) <br /> Plaruiing Commission concluded that the RPUD standards for SFR development are generally <br /> appropriate for this site, with a few minor revisions. The RPUD standards [Section 78-626(8)] <br /> are sununarized as follows: <br /> - 15,000 sf min. dry buildable lot area (PC indicated 14,000 sf min. was acceptable) <br /> - 90' nlinimum lot width at the setback line (all 8 new lots meet this using a 30' street <br /> setback...) <br /> - 125' minimum lot depth (Lots 4, 5, 6, 7 and 10 are just short of this standard, but these <br /> depths are a result of significant tweaking to date, and each lot contains a usable <br /> building site with acceptable rear yard. <br /> - 40' rear yard or 20% of lot depth, whichever is Iess (all lots meet this standard) <br /> - 25' front setback on intei-nal streets (30' was used for this plat and will be used for <br /> home construction, which allows the lots to meet the 90' lot width standard) <br /> - 50' setback on collector ar arterial streets (eYisting Williamson house at 40' will remain <br /> nonconfoi-�ning...) <br /> - 10' side yard on interior lot lines (all lots conforni), 15' side yard at exterior of RPUD <br /> (east line of Lot S propose�l at 10', s/aould�evise to 1 S'; nort/z yrrr�l of Lot 3 <br /> shoccld increase to 1 S'; west yard of Lot 6 shoccl�l revise to 1 S') <br /> - side yards abutting street must ineet front setback requirement (all lots meet tlus) <br /> - 30' max building height (based on proposed grading plan—no need for variances) <br /> G. Lot Coverage vs. Floor Area Ratio (FAR) <br /> Section 78-1403, the 15% Lot Coverage limit, states that tlie 15% limit applies to all zoning <br /> districts; it doesn't make an exception for RPUD, However, the RPUD District does not <br /> specifically establish a `Lot Coverage by Structtu•es' limit. Instead, the RPUD standards limit <br /> individual lots to 50% hardcover and an individual lot Floor Area Ratio (FAR= gross area of all <br /> floors divided by gross lot area) of 0.5. This means a 14,000 s.f. lot is allowed 7,000 s.f. of floor <br /> space. A 2-story 30' Y 70' walkout with a basement, two stories, and an attached 3-stall,l-level <br /> 24' x 30' garage would yield 7020 s.f. of floor area, as �n eYample. <br /> The 8 proposed homes range to as much as 25% lot coverage. P1aiuling Commission reviewed <br /> the potential home sizes based on using the 0.5 FAR versus the 15% lot coverage limit, and <br /> recommended that the 0.5 FAR should apply to this development, but not the 15% lot coverage <br /> limit. This area is not in a shoreland hardcover zone, and hardcover of 50% per the RPUD <br /> standards is not uiu•easonable. <br /> H. Road Layout and Standards <br /> The proposed road layout meets the coi7•ieior standards of a 50' road right-of-way and 100' cul- <br /> de-sac diameter. The access location onto Willow Drive is directly across fi•om Elm Lane, which <br /> is appropriate. The City would normally require that all lots in a subdivision be served with <br /> driveways fi-om the new local road rather than fi•om the arterial (Willow is defined in the CMP as <br />