01-09-2006 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

#OS-3149 September 19,2005 - Page 6 of 7 - Impacts to Adjacent Property Owners The nearest property owner is to the west at a distance of approxim�tely 250'. This site is a group home (also operating under 1 conciitional use permit) and would not be negatively impacted by the proposed expansion as most of the improvements are on the east side of the property. The property owner to the e�st is a residential home, currently 360' from the church. The extent of the parking lot curi•ently reaches to a distance of approximately 100' to the house, with the closest location being where the Wolsfeld Woods public entrance is located. The proposed acidition would bring the church a distance of approximately 320' from the house to the east. The proposal will not add any negative impacts as no parking lot lighting is proposed and any building mounted lighting will be directed downwaxds and is probably too great a distance away for that light to even reach the property line. Lastly, there are tlu•ee residential homes to the south, on the south side of Sixth Avenue N. These homes range in distauce from 390' to 490' from the front fa�ade of the eaisting church. Staff does not foresee any negative impacts resulting to these properties with the proposal. CUP Standards In accordance with Section 78-916 (a) (1-3), the Planning Coirunission may reconunend and the Council may grant a conditional use permit as the use permit was applied for or in modified form, if on the basis of the application and the evidence subinitted the City inakes the following findings: (1) That the proposed location of the conditional use is in accord with the objectives of this chapter and the purposes of the district in which the site is located and the comprehensive municipal plan; The p��o�osed e�:pernsions to the conditioncri zrse cr�•e in czcco��dance ivith the Municipal Cocle c�s chau•ches cr��e listed as cr conditional zcse irr the "R" clis��icts. The proposed e.zp�rnsions nt°e to c� use considered l�istoriccal ort tl�e pi°ope�•ty cznd, in gene��al, 1a�ithin the reqzci�•etnents of ll�e Zoning O�•dzn�rnce. (2) That the proposed location of the conditional use and the proposed condition under which it would be operated or maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially 111�LU'101iS to properties or improvenients in the vicinity; and The�r�oposed condilr.'o�u�l zrse tivoz�lc�not be det�•imenl�rl to pzrblic hecrltl�, safety o�• ��elfca�e. TI�e p��operty l�crs been used ns ct cl�urch sance prior l0 1970. (3) That the proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of this ch�pter. Tlze sr»gle piece of tl�e pro�osal. ��ot co»�plyi��g wi11� ctpplicable cocles is the