My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-09-2006 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
01-09-2006 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2015 12:46:12 PM
Creation date
7/13/2015 12:45:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� <br /> MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL NIEETING <br /> Monday,llecember 12, 2005 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (6. #OS-3I31 STEVE BOHL OF BOHLAND DEVELOPMENT, INC., 190 WILLOW <br /> DRIVE NORTHAND 177 GLENDALE DRIi�E, Coiztinued) <br /> time. Gappa stated the east side was considered because there is also a better chance for obtaining the <br /> necessaiy easements. <br /> McMillan stated there presently is a bike shoulder along Willow Road. McMillan inquired whether the <br /> bike trail is on the achial road. <br /> Gaf$�on stated the road itself serves as the trail, with a separate trail segment running fi-om Glendale Drive <br /> to the church property. Gaffi-on illust�•ated the section of tlle trail that the Park Cominission has concluded <br /> should be constructed <br /> Gappa stated they would like the h•ail from the private road up to Glendale constructed now. <br /> Gaffron stated one item considered was the fact that on the west side of the road there are a number of <br /> homes located close to the road. Gaffi-on stated if the �re station were busier, that might be a reason to <br /> liinit a h-ail in front of the access to the fire station. <br /> McMillan stated she has a concern about having a public trail go into a private road and then back out to <br /> Willow Road. McMillan stated in her opinion the h�ail should all be public or the trail should be <br /> eliminated. <br /> Murphy stated he also would prefer the road Ue puUlic. <br /> Gaffron stated part of the rationale far making this road a public road would be the fact that this area is <br /> considered urban density and would have public utilities. Gaffron con-unented the road would become a <br /> maintenance issue for the City, especially given the fact that it is a cul-de-sac. <br /> Murphy stated the residents located within the private property of this development or the homeov�mers <br /> association would have jurisdiction of that portion of the hail and may create confusion in the fiiture. <br /> Sansevere stated he also has an issue with a portion of the h�ail going through private land. <br /> White stated having an outlet to Long Lake makes sense. <br /> Gaffron stated there would proUably have to be an association regardless if the road is private or public <br /> since there are two outlots proposed. <br /> Sansevere stated in his view the private recreational area would likely not remain private if there is a <br /> public trail in close proximity to it. <br /> Bohl stated one of the recouzmendations of the environmentatist was to revegetate Outlot B. <br /> Jurgens stated one of the reasons the Planning Commission looked at a private road was the width of the <br /> road and right-of-way. Jurgens stated it was his understanding that tlle h-ail would be separate from the <br /> private road. <br /> Gaffi-on inquired whether there are any differences in tt�e standards between a puUlic and a private road. <br /> PAGE 7 of 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.