Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday March 13, 2017 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br />does not want to be in the party enforcement business. Walsh stated the City did have a problem that <br />came up but that he has been struggling with how to deal with it since the events did not really generate <br />any noise or traffic issues. <br /> <br />Walsh noted the City Council has three new members on it since last fall and they do not have the history <br />on the issue. Walsh stated the Council should perhaps table it to gather more information and more <br />public input through another public hearing. Walsh stated people cannot park on the street he lives on at <br />all and when he has a party, the neighbors have to walk to his house. Walsh stated he does not want to pit <br />neighbor against neighbor whenever someone has a party. Walsh stated in his view the City Council <br />needs more public input to understand how to better deal with this and that it is similar to the quandary <br />the Council found itself in when trying to define a living wall. <br /> <br />Crosby stated he would like to hear from the public. <br /> <br />Dankey stated she heard a lot of the things already said that she has been thinking. Dankey stated when <br />she read through the draft ordinance she thought, no way, I do not want to support this. Dankey stated <br />she does attend a lot of charity parties in Orono and oftentimes they have more than 20 people. Dankey <br />stated the ordinance seems to be a little bit punitive and that it seems like the City is hitting everyone for <br />what may be one or two issues. Dankey stated she is not sure if there is another way to do this. <br /> <br />Seals stated she knows the Planning Commission and Staff have looked into this. Seals asked whether <br />Staff knows what other communities do in relation to this. <br /> <br />Brian Gerard, 680 North Arm Drive, stated he did read through the ordinance and that he has some major <br />issues with it. Gerard stated it comes down to definitions and what is the definition of an occasional party <br />or a crowd. Gerard stated he frequently will have a dinner party where people will spend the night and <br />the next day they might go boating or have a fire. Within a couple of weekends he would need a permit. <br /> <br />Gerard indicated he is also a real estate agent and that some weekends they might do two open houses and <br />two more the following weekend. Gerard stated he would have to pull a permit for the fourth one. <br />Gerard indicated he has talked to other residents and they feel the City should not be dictating how often <br />someone has a dinner party. Gerard stated the way the ordinance is written, it would be hard for residents <br />to stomach. <br /> <br />Walsh stated in his view the Council agrees with him. <br /> <br />Cindy Hilger, 585 South Brown Road, stated the Council has spoken to a lot of issues that she has with <br />the ordinance and that in her view the City will not be able to enforce it. Hilger indicated she lives on a <br />property that is highly visible and if the Council was to take her property and put it at the center of a half <br />mile circle, there would be, at a minimum, 21 properties that are either hidden by trees, gates, or long <br />driveways. Hilger stated those 21 properties are basically invisible but someone would be able to count <br />the number of cars in her driveway. Hilger stated the City is basically asking her to police her neighbors, <br />which is not her job, and that she resents being asked to do that. Hilger stated it is big brother at its finest <br />and that she is not sure this is how people want to live. <br /> <br />Gail Blackstone, 4465 Forest Lake Landing, stated she lives in the neighborhood where the incidents <br />occurred last summer and she did not feel disrupted at all during that period. Blackstone indicated she <br />was not aware of the previous public hearing that had been held but that she is concerned about the broad