My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-12-2008 Council Work Session Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2008
>
11-12-2008 Council Work Session Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2015 2:45:40 PM
Creation date
7/9/2015 2:45:38 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
These four houses were basically a lakeshore slum for many years because of the <br /> uncertainty of property values reievant to dock rights. That has changed, and we have <br /> invested heavily in our property based upon the assessed value, as have others in recent <br /> years. <br /> We understand that there is an estimate of approximately $30,000 for researching all <br /> titles of the houses in question in the defined neighborhood, but that the City Council is <br /> reluctant to invest this amount of tax dollars for such a small issue. We would certainly <br /> agree, especially when there is no viable solution or plan that would be undertaken and <br /> that would be able to accommodate this defined neighborhood. <br /> We feel this is now infringing on our rights to be able to sell and realize the value of our <br /> home and our investment in it, based on its value. We are assessed and taxed as if we <br /> have deeded access. When we purchased nine years ago the documents indicated that <br /> access was "technically deeded" but that the actual shore was owned by the city and we <br /> spoke with the city and were told there were no plans to change this status. <br /> We would like to respectfully request thax the City Council consider undertaking a"quiet <br /> title action" which would grant permanent dock rights to our property and which should <br /> not trigger any need to address anything that already exists as far as people being <br /> welcome to come down and enjoy the shoreline...again, even though they do not <br /> cunently do so. We also feel that the legal concept of"adverse possession" —relevant to <br /> the fact that this house has had perpetual boating/dock privile�es for almost 100 years- <br /> would support such an action. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> , ��� <br /> y <br /> Yousry and Karen Elshazly <br /> 3415 Crystal Bay Road <br /> Orono, MN 55391 <br /> 952-471-8012 <br /> karenelshazly a,gmail.com <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.