Laserfiche WebLink
, , <br /> r <br /> All of that being said, it is suggested that a dist'tnction be made between newly created lots and <br /> , existing lots of record. In the case of new lats,the buffer requirement can be adcfressed in the <br /> ; subdivision process. In this regard, we concur with the comments from the City of Wayzata and <br /> ' others, that some sort of setback from the buffer should be considered in order to create at <br /> ieast minimal usable yard space. <br /> ' Consideratian should be given to "grandfathering in" existing lots of record in order to avoid <br /> the issue of regulatory taking. Failure to do so could often preclude the homeowner from <br /> rebuilding a potentially substandard home, choosing instead to add on or remodel, which <br /> would often result in loss of opportunity to make any environmental improvement whatsoever. <br /> � <br /> Rule D revisions: <br /> � Requiring all excavation to be subject to repiacement whether or not it is subject to the State of <br /> � Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). This revision will make retrofitting the existing <br /> ; storm system for water quality improvements financially unfeasible. New retrofit devices wilf <br /> likely be placed at the pipe outlets and require the use of de minimus wetland impacts to remain <br /> � feasible. <br /> ; <br /> ! Thank you for your consideration and attention to these comments. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> ; <br /> � �- �--�' ����'�' �7-�.,� <br /> � � <br /> James Landini Brad Nielsen <br /> City Engineer City Planner , <br /> � <br /> , <br /> � <br /> , <br /> � <br /> � <br /> , I <br /> ; <br /> � <br /> ' i <br /> i a <br /> I i <br /> ! <br /> ' I <br /> : , <br /> ; � <br /> ' <br /> I <br /> i <br /> . � <br /> i � <br /> i ' I <br />