My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-09-2010 Council Work Session Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2010
>
02-09-2010 Council Work Session Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2019 10:29:12 AM
Creation date
7/9/2015 12:40:08 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
169
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
+ ;sS,�6L�F ti... <br /> 4 �. '��, <br /> ' _a� �� A°'r,'`; January l3,2010 <br /> Rti'-��'� � ': <br /> h <br /> ' '�.�,��� o� r James Wisker <br /> ,'lV �p1°' MCWD Planner <br /> � � , - 18202 Minnetonka Blvd. <br /> ......_. .. <br /> - - ; Deephaven,MN, 55391 <br /> �di�ini.u�fr;�:r�,tjr��� lames: <br /> �1'I�`1�+�:Si 12it��r'lioail <br /> _ <br /> �i.i,r�a�,I��.+��v'S��a!i:sz29 ��you for tiie opportunity to comment on the proposed Rules F and <br /> c��"`Y'f!""°�'a"'c" D. Generally we support the changes proposed as bringing clarity and <br /> ��$`�'��t�'''�"'�`��"�'�� greater effectiveness to tl�e MCWD Rules. <br /> {WinneApofi9;:tvi�153+109-1�?(7 <br /> ��"'"`'`��`�"�y� We do however have two important issues with the Rule D: Wetlands <br /> �"`�"���4�'�6� outlined below. We do not support the adoption of Rule D without. <br /> `��'"''""�`�"���""�`"�` resolution of these two issues, <br /> 1) Section 4(c} of the rule is repeated here: <br /> " 4.BUFFER. <br /> (c)A permanent wetland buffer monument shall be installed at each <br /> lot line where it crosses a wctland bufPer,and where needed to indicate <br /> thc contour of the buffer,with a maximum spacing of l Od feet. <br /> Language shall indicate the purpose of the buffer,restrictions,and the <br /> name and phone number of the Minnehaha Creek Watershcd District. <br /> The installation of Qermanent markers on MPRB property every 100 feet <br /> would create safety hazards to park users,maintenance obstacles,blots on <br /> historic landscapes, and erode the viewing aesthetics of our parks. We <br /> fell it is inappropriate to require these monurnents on public property and <br /> rr�r.��t�,r, object strongly to this section of the rule. <br /> :CohaiGnFin <br /> N'���''��"`f""' It is unclear to us the justification of this blanket requirement. What <br /> �'�'""�'���"�a problems have been encountered that would justify this intrusion on the <br /> c�,x„ras��,�w� <br /> ���m park lands? <br /> ut�a tx;i� <br /> c���A.:�,��r 2) Section 6(a) of Rule D is repeated here. <br /> ion+C�:Q1�crn <br /> �1n3tu Ts�6b 6.WETLAND$UFFER VEGETATION. <br /> �'ctuf'V�,�cland <br /> Lar.�V'ic3in:�! (a)Upon final establishment and cessation of monitoring and <br /> 3'?+�.rr-inisr,t.'eRr maintenance,wetland buffers shall consist of 100%vegetative cover <br /> x0����0i�"' with little or no bare soil.A minimum of 75°/a of the vegetative cover <br /> �a�,�+mr�+iUi6e.�trwril: shall cansist of plant species native to Minnesota. <br /> SJatt&igg�ilkcitv <br /> sr���rinre���tmJis$mcriirer This requirement appears arbitrary and difficult to implement and <br /> M���j����� enforce. How is this to be measured? <br /> 1},�ici;t-ssti�it <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.