Laserfiche WebLink
subcommittee of this group (including me) will meet next week to boil down the various city <br /> responses into a single unified position statement. An additional point of discussion was <br /> whether we need to have a joint effort in monitoring the rulemaking processes as we go <br /> forward, perhaps sharing the costs of an engineer or other professional to act as a <br /> representative of the cities. Pm not too excited about that idea, as I think we benefit from the <br /> input of our own engineers who know Orono's point of view. In your work session packet I <br /> will provide copies of responses to MCWD from other cities, agencies, businesses and <br /> individuals. (MPG) <br /> � Attached is the draft agenda for the Tuesday, February 9t" work session. A work session <br /> packet will be available at Monday's Council meeting. <br /> The City of O�•ono complies with the Mi�znesota Data Practices and Open Meeting Law. The recipients of this <br /> elect��onic file are askecl not to "Fo�-ward"o�• "Replv to All"concerning infor-mation contai�zed in this email. <br />