My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-09-2010 Council Work Session Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2010
>
02-09-2010 Council Work Session Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2019 10:29:12 AM
Creation date
7/9/2015 12:40:08 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
169
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
t t <br /> �;� <br /> �/; <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> To: Mayor& City Council <br /> From: Mike Gaffron, Asst. City Admin. - Long Term Strategy <br /> Date: February 8, 2010 <br /> Subject: MCWD Rules D & F <br /> Attachments: <br /> A - 2/3/10 email from James Wisker re: MCWD Board Discussions Set for 2/11 and 2/18 <br /> B - Copies of Letters to MCWD from Various Agencies, Parties, Etc. <br /> On February 5 a group of Lake Minnetonka city administrators met to discuss the possibility and <br /> advantages of a combined response to the MCWD rulemaking process. While we may have some <br /> minor philosophical differences with some of our sister cities on specific details of the proposed rules, <br /> there are a few key points that we all likely agree on. A small subcommittee of this group (including <br /> me) will be meeting on Thursday February 11 in an attempt to boil down the various city responses into <br /> a single unified position statement regarding these key points. <br /> An additional point of discussion was whether we need to have a joint effort in monitoring the <br /> rulemaking processes as we go forward, perhaps sharing the costs of an engineer or other professional <br /> to act as a representative of the cities. I'm not too excited about that idea, as I think we benefit from the <br /> input of our own engineers who know Orono's point of view. <br /> The attached packet contains copies of responses to MCWD from other cities, agencies, businesses and <br /> individuals, compiled by Mound city staf£ Note that you may find what appear to be duplicate copies <br /> from the same party - these are likely separate letters on Rule D or Rule F. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.