Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, January 13, 2020 <br />6:00 o'clock p.m. <br />Crosby added that the Highway 12 area has been horrible for a long time. He told the young people in the <br />audience to stay off of Highway 12, drive carefully, and drive sober. He mentioned NDSU won its eighth <br />national title. The Vikings blew it, but he is still a loyal fan. <br />Walsh wished everyone a Happy New Year and a Happy New Decade. The Council had a great 2019. <br />He thanked Staff for their work. <br />CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT <br />19. REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO COMPREHENSIVELY REVIEW CITY OF ORONO <br />PERSONNEL POLICY FOR UPDATES <br />Rief said the current employee handbook was adopted in February 2009. When it was completed it was <br />not sectioned nor done as well as he'd like. He would like to look at changes in the employee policies that <br />might need to be made from a legal standpoint and also look at the union contracts, make sure there's <br />nothing that conflicts, and put the handbook in a better format and more readable for the employees. After <br />the revision, when the City adopts something, he will not have to re -adopt the whole book. Instead, he can <br />just refer to the policy number and revise it. <br />Walsh asked if Rief would be reviewing it with Mattick or by himself. <br />Rief stated it would be reviewed by the leadership team and Mattick. It would be broken down into <br />sections, and if there are any changes in a section, those would be brought forward. Currently there are <br />barely page numbers in it; there are different sections, but they are not labeled. For instance, he cannot <br />refer to a specific Code; he has to say, "page 35, line number 14," making it difficult to provide <br />information to an employee if they are talking on the phone. The new document would have sections <br />such as "Benefits" or "How to Deal With a Grievance." <br />Johnson said it is difficult to know from Rief s request the scope of the project. He feels part of his job is <br />to align the Council and the Mayor's priorities and Staff. It's hard to know from his vantage point what <br />the City's priorities are and which ones the resources are getting put to. This is an example of something <br />that needs to be done, but he knows there are other priorities such as employee reviews. He asked if this <br />request would push that priority back. <br />Rief stated it would not. As far as performance reviews, the new system is in place, everybody is <br />conducting the employee reviews with that system, and he will be able to provide the City Council with a <br />report the first part of February. Outside of completing the first set of reviews, that project is pretty much <br />complete. <br />Seals noted she agrees the request probably needs to be done but it is not like the wheels are falling off <br />the bus. Until she can get an update on the performance reviews, she does not want to distract Rief <br />because she thinks part of the Council's job is to help keep Rief focused. <br />Walsh, Seals, and Crosby suggested approving the request with the caveat that it take place after the <br />performance reviews are done. <br />Johnson indicated that is what he was bringing up. <br />Page 6of7 <br />