Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, December 9, 2019 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />The City Council took no action on this item. <br />FINANCE DIRECTOR REPORT <br />22. ADOPT THE 2020 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN <br />Olson said the Capital Improvement Plan is for the long-range maintenance, repair, and replacement of <br />the City's infrastructure which ranges from vehicles and plow trucks to roads. The plan was talked about <br />in-depth at a work session. It is a planning document only, and anything that is approved would have to <br />come back to the Council for approval again. <br />Walsh stated it is a general plan of what the City is doing for the next 5-8 years so the City can budget <br />and get funding. <br />Seals referenced Long Lake Fire and confirmed that it is a planning document and everything still has to <br />come through the City Council even though the biggest expense does not hit until 2028. <br />Printup moved, Crosby seconded, to adopt the 2020 Capital Improvement Plan. VOTE: Ayes 5, <br />nays 0. <br />15. LA18-000094 — LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT O/B/O RUSSEL KOCON AND <br />JACQUELINE GIBNEY, 3570 IVY PLACE — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR <br />PERMANENT DOCK — RESOLUTION NO. 7061 <br />Johnson said he pulled the item because the description did not include the LMCD, as far as whose <br />jurisdiction the dock had to meet. It referenced the DNR and Watershed District, and the LMCD would <br />have jurisdiction on the dock itself. <br />Walsh stated either way the applicant would have to get their approval. <br />Johnson said there is language included that gave a specific distance for reflectors on the permanent dock. <br />He did not feel the City Council should decide what the correct spacing for reflectors is and should rely <br />on the LMCD to have ordinances about permanent docks. <br />Walsh asked for confirmation that the LMCD has ordinances for reflectors on permanent docks. <br />Barnhart said he is not certain if they do. He stated the language is a mirror of a condition at Shadywood <br />from a couple years earlier. He suggested adding "at least every 25 feet" so that if the LMCD has a more <br />stringent requirement, that application would apply. <br />Seals suggested using language of "reflectors should follow the LMCD code" so the City does not impose <br />on the LMCD's business, adding that the City would not be inspecting it. <br />Crosby agreed with Seals. <br />Mattick said it would not need to be added if the LMCD has a code on it. <br />Page 7 of 34 <br />