My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-13-2020 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2020
>
01-13-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2020 3:24:24 PM
Creation date
3/20/2020 11:07:17 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, December 9, 2019 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Barnhart said it is usually closers/title companies who are asking for verification. If a resident calls to ask <br />about zoning of a property, the City answers the question and there is no charge. He said his rule of thumb <br />is, if it takes more time to fill out the receipt, he does not charge a fee. Some retaining walls will trigger a <br />City Council review, and they want to be upfront about that. Regarding Site Inspection Without Permit, <br />Staff added the 8% interest for unpaid charges. Staff will go to the site and review and provide feedback. <br />If it is not paid, there is no escrow to tie it to, so there is interest charged. <br />Johnson asked if that was $45 a year. <br />Barnhart said the fee is part of the septic process. Regarding the fire inspection, it's tied to the value to be <br />consistent with the rest of the building permits. If it is mandated by the building code, it is based on the <br />value of the improvement, and Staff is bringing that in compliance with the building code. When Staff <br />tried to address stormwater trunk fees, they created an elaborate program that thought of a lot of <br />opportunities/options. There's a lot of math built into the proposal. He referred to the information <br />regarding the single-family residential five -acre zone and the changes made. <br />Walsh asked if Staff was just getting rid of extra words. <br />Barnhart confirmed his statement. <br />Seals and Walsh discussed the equation and cost for one-half acre, 1 -acre, and 2 -acre parcels. <br />Johnson asked if the City's expense on a 2 -acre lot over a 5 -acre lot is $8,000 more. <br />Barnhart said that was the arithmetic done in 2015. The numbers are different based on the land uses and <br />based on the zoning district. He is not proposing any changes to the actual number, he is just removing <br />some words. He noted there are several categories of zoning districts. <br />Seals asked if there were any stormwater and drainage trunk fees anymore for multi -family residential. <br />Barnhart and Walsh said those were still on the document. <br />Crosby said they are 8,490. <br />Johnson asked if the City has a commercial marina license. <br />Barnhart said it is in the Code, there is a fee, but it could be removed. <br />Walsh suggested getting rid of it in addition to the one-time dock permit fee. <br />Johnson said he thought the Council already got rid of it. <br />Walsh clarified that the City Council agreed to not license them. <br />Johnson clarified that he was talking about the multi -dock. He thought the City Council got rid of the <br />multi -dock because the City Council was not doing anything for them. <br />Barnhart said the City still issues those. <br />Page 29 of 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.